Search for: "United States v. Kaplan" Results 361 - 380 of 415
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2009, 1:16 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice 'Flores-Figueroa' Requires Vacatur of Alien's §1028A Aggravated Identity Theft Conviction United States v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 2:31 pm
This Leadership Council has decided that the ABA should come in 100% against the civil rights community, every consumer rights organization in the United States, and a variety of other public interest organizations, and be 100% on the side of the American Bankers' Association, the cell phone industry, and similar groups. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:35 pm
  In its suit, O'Donnell's company emphasizes its "extensive United States patent protection" for its trading tools. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:21 am
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit filed an opinion, in United Health Group Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
In the 1770s, the colonies of what would later be known as the United States of America sought their freedom from England. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 11:03 am
"The United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, affirmed the district court's ruling.The Circuit Court decision is posted on the Internet at:[caselaw.lp.findlaw.com] . [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 12:16 pm
United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957). [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:10 pm
Spurred by Judge Lewis Kaplan's excoriation of the government for such heavy-handed tactics and his dismissal of an indictment in the KPMG prosecution in the Southern District of New York (United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 3:33 pm
Aug. 28, 2008) (available here), starts with this summary: The United States appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kaplan, J.), dismissing an indictment against Defendants-Appellees, thirteen former partners and employees of accounting firm KPMG, LLP. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 11:11 pm
Douglas Floyd, THREE FACES OF SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AFTER THE DEMISE OF UNITED MINE WORKERS v. [read post]