Search for: "United States v. Key" Results 361 - 380 of 10,186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2012, 6:35 am by Robert Chesney
  The key passage: At bottom, then, the defendants’ position is irreconcilable with the noncontroversial notion that Congress intended in § 1651 to define piracy as a universal jurisdiction crime. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:36 am
United States, No. 08-5657, 2009 WL 160585 (Jan. 26, 2009)The Supreme Court is done pussyfooting around. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 3:02 pm
There are increasing calls for States and business to step up action, including for States to negotiate a legally binding instrument. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
May (The Free State Foundation) & Andrew Magloughlin (The Free State Foundation) have posted NFIB v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 1:17 pm by Lawrence Solum
Part I of this Article situates Citizens United in the campaign finance jurisprudence that preceded it and describes in detail the key opinions in the case. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am by Poppy Weston-Davies
Arizona, et al., Petitioners v United States The Court decided by five votes to three that three of four provisions inArizona’s Senate Bill 1070 were null. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 8:35 am by Charlotte Bamford
Particular regard was given to the case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439, where it was held that allowing an extradition of a party to the United States would constitute a violation of that person’s Article 3 rights, as he would be exposed to the risk of the application of the death penalty as a direct consequence of the extradition. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 7:27 am by Mark M. Campanella, Esq.
Windsor is one of many cases currently challenging DOMA across the United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am by Paul Rosenzweig
   If the United States government can encrypt its data, so can China, or the Russian mob, or a Mexican drug cartel. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 12:35 pm by Gene Quinn
Earlier today, the Precedential Opinion Panel (POP) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) overruled the institution decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in GoPro, Inc. v. 360Heros, Inc., IPR2018-01754, which related to U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:34 am by MBettman
Justice Frankfurter’s concurrence found that the Eighth and Fifth Amendments were not applicable to states, a position that has since been rejected. ) United States v. [read post]