Search for: "United States v. Line Material Co."
Results 361 - 380
of 971
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2016, 9:04 am
Heinz Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:45 am
” In response to petitioner’s cancellation request, respondent filed a motion for summary judgment with the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) on April 28, 2014, seeking judgment as a matter of law with regards to petitioner’s claim for mere descriptiveness. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
"[139] "Speak" is often used in First Amendment cases to refer not just to oral statements but to writing or to display of material: For instance, the Court in Cohen v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
Kresge Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
The court was told that after the third report was completed and sent to all parties, the complainer, solicitor Ms Crabbe, stated that the reporter had not seen all the documentation he was supposed to have. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:13 am
Christopher O’Shea et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:21 am
Hughes Aircraft Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 12:25 pm
United States, 295 U.S. 495, 539 , and Panama Refining Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm
See Flag-Redfern Oil Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
FRENCH: Cliquez ici pour le télécharger. .GRAND CHAMBERCASE OF S.A.S. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
Rather, a court need only determine whether the alleged misconduct is the type of activity which falls within a general description of bribery.[9] Product liability defendants may well have a claim that the dealings between plaintiffs’ lawyers and the physicians involved in medical screenings involve an ongoing course of what can properly be viewed as bribes to witnesses to submit materially false evidence in violation of state law. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 1:49 pm
Below are the materials I drafted for the seminar. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 7:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:49 am
"Three almost identical actions have since been filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:42 pm
In Central Bank of Denver v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 12:57 pm
The DOJ and Astellas ultimately settled for $100 million, including a $50 million payment described in the settlement agreement as “restitution to the United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:21 pm
United States, 64 F.3d 206 (5th Cir. 1995); Barnes v. [read post]
