Search for: "United States v. Michigan" Results 361 - 380 of 3,739
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm by Luke Rioux
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:09 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:45 am by WIMS
The United States appeals, arguing the amount of the penalty is inadequate. [read post]
18 May 2016, 2:42 pm by Jon
 Clerked for United States Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy.Joan Larsen -- Michigan. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 2:03 pm by Hilf & Hilf, PLC
 Even though the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the people from unreasonable searches and seizures, people still get pulled over with little justification. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:28 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 12:47 pm by ---------------------------------
On February 23, 2010, the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division, decided the case of In re: Quality Stores, Inc., et al., Debtors; United States of America v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:40 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 11:55 am by admin
The insurance industry in our post-Citizens United World now gives unlimited amounts of money to judges and justices who publicly campaign promise to overturn decisions like McCormick v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 3:17 pm by WIMS
The United States Army used the airfield from 1942 to 1945. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:06 pm by stu@crimapp.com
In Citizens United v Federal Election Commission, 103 SCt 876 (2010),the United States Supreme Court struck down limits on campaign spending by outside organizations. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 8:08 am by Steve Satterfield
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan has allowed a putative class action under Michigan law to proceed against several magazine publishers that allegedly sold lists of their customers’ names, addresses, and subscription choices to third parties. [read post]