Search for: "United States v. New York Times Company" Results 361 - 380 of 3,294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2011, 9:18 pm by Dan
The story concludes with the key point, that Chinese companies listing or doing business in the United States had better start getting used to being sued in the United States According to Harris, that VisionChina, a Chinese company doing business exclusively in China, chose to sue in New York is a testament in itself to the new calculation for US-listed companies. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:57 am by Danielle Citron
New York Times, March 26, 1911, p.1. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:26 am by Greg Mersol
  In some instances, however, irrespective of certification, problems as to the merits will dispose of the case entirely, as two cases decided the same day by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York demonstrate. [read post]
25 May 2018, 12:21 pm by Kelsey Farish
In particular, the lawsuit alleged that publishers – including the New York Times, TIME, and Economist – shared licensed articles written by freelancers to the Lexis/Nexis electronic database and other digital indexers, without first obtaining the writers’ approval.James Gleick was previously a reporter and editor for The New York Times for 10 years. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 5:31 am
The policy provided that the governing law was New York law, and under New York law, the policyholder bears the burden of showing that the insurance contract covers the loss. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:41 am by Peter J. Sluka
In Stile v C-Air Customhouse Brokers-Forwards, Inc., Index No. 656575/2020 [Sup Ct, New York County 2021], the New York County Supreme Court declined to dismiss a suit by the estate of a shareholder subject to a stay away settlement agreement on the grounds that the stay away obligations did not expressly apply to the shareholder’s successors. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:10 am by Eugene Volokh
For more on the remaining stun-gun bans throughout the United States, see my 2009 article; the Michigan and Wisconsin bans have been repealed, but the bans in Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, the District, the Virgin Islands and several cities still remain. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 11:53 am by Jesse Mondry
Supreme Court will not decide this case for months, its decision will have a substantial impact on dispute resolution for foreign companies doing business in the United States and for domestic companies doing business internationally. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Removal was governed by § 205 of the FAA, which provides:Where the subject matter of an action or proceeding pending in a State court relates to an arbitration agreement or award falling under the Convention, the defendant or the defendants may, at any time before the trial thereof, remove such action or proceeding to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where the action or proceeding is pending. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak reports on all four of yesterday’s opinions for The New York Times, and Nina Totenberg does the same at NPR. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:59 pm by Ryan Singel
However, none of the companies have cut off services to newspapers such as The New York Times that have extensively reported on and reproduced many of the cables. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 4:32 am
NOTE: From time to time, the blog will examine significant new cases  filed at the Supreme Court. [read post]