Search for: "United States v. One Package"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,677
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2008, 9:53 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:29 am
United States is a case about the classification of used clothing coming into the United States.The plaintiff imported bales of used clothing and classified the merchandise in HTSUS item 6309.00.00 as "worn clothing," which is a duty free. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:19 pm
This kind of violation was alleged in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 7:02 pm
Sixty-five-year sentence for a juvenile convicted under RICO predicated on murder upheld/ Upon resentencing, the “sentence-package doctrine” must be clearly raised or risk being waived United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 1:55 pm
See United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
California together with United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:52 am
Stating that this argument mischaracterized the employee’s claim, the Ninth Circuit pointed out that was only one element of several that she claimed contributed to a HWE claim. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 2:51 am
The Court reviewed the “mechanics” of applying the enhancement as set forth in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 5:41 am
Back in February, we hosted a guest post about United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:21 am
An amendment to the tender package changed this pricing scheme to require – instead of the separate unit prices – only a single unit price for all types of fill material regardless of the relative amounts of each type that might finally be required onsite. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:24 am
The first plaintiff, Constanza, seeks to represent a class of fitness managers from any club in the entire United States; these workers give personal training lessons and sell training packages. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 7:05 am
Unilever United States, Inc. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:06 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit explained in Dippin’ Dots, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm
(United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm
(United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Accordingly, Congress amends the statute, and now says to the States: “From this point forward, it's the Carrot/Broccoli Distribution Act, and the package is carrots and broccoli. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 3:21 am
United States, 2007 U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
