Search for: "United States v. Padilla"
Results 361 - 380
of 472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2009, 8:05 am
See United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 4:31 am
Supreme Court ruling in Padilla v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:24 am
Supreme Court: Competence Requires that Defense Counsel Correctly Advise Criminal Defendants of Deportation Risk Due to Conviction,” the United States Supreme Court has recognized in Padilla v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:41 am
Thus, they rely on Padilla v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 10:55 pm
" Indeed, you don't have to go far to see the limits of Iqbal; just last month the District Court in Padilla v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 7:36 pm
” The court traces Puerto Rico path to becoming a “possession” of the United States, observing that the underlying definition of marriage did not change. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:02 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:10 am
†The Legal Intelligencer has an article on the University of Pennsylvania Law School’s Supreme Court clinic’s role in Padilla v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:24 pm
But the legal uncertainty changed today when the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Padilla v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:23 am
As a lawyer, she was probably best known for arguing United Church of Christ v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
United States, 12-8543, that concerns the retroactive application of Padilla v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm
§ 27.031(b)(4); TEX.R.CIV.P. 501.1[2]; Padilla v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:30 pm
Thus, the Court concluded, Padilla’s circumstances fell within the scope of Sixth Amendment protection and were subject to analysis under the test established in Strickland v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
Louisiana, 14-280 (third relist since the Court received the state’s brief in opposition); Tolliver v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:01 pm
In Padilla v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
Padilla v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am
In lieu of granting leave to appeal the Court reversed the Court of Appeals in People v McKinney, concluding that the defendant’s statement that he would “just as soon wait” until he had an attorney before talking to the police, followed immediately by his statement that he was willing to discuss the “circumstances,” was not an unequivocal assertion of the right to counsel or a statement declaring an intention to remain silent under Davis v… [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:51 am
United States v. [read post]
