Search for: "United States v. Sealed Defendant One"
Results 361 - 380
of 669
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
Terms are negotiated among the various believers and non-believers; a rules committee is formed; and Luke agrees to a one-hour time limit in which to eat all 50 eggs. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 5:43 am
This post discusses the first published North Carolina appellate court strip search case since these posts: State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 5:43 am
This post discusses the first published North Carolina appellate court strip search case since these posts: State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:47 pm
” Laughlin v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:03 am
United States, 730 F.2d 1465, 1468 (Fed. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 7:43 pm
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm
The court file was thereafter sealed. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 11:57 am
Courts Tell Police to Keep their Dogs’ Noses out of Curtilage The one thing made abundantly clear by the Texas Court of Appeals’ December 16, 2015 decision in State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 5:16 am
The District Court Judge then pointed out that the Government complied with the Court's order by providing a declaration from Robert Patterson, an Assistant Special Agent in Charge at the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (`DEA’), which the Government initially filed ex parte and under seal and later filed publicly in redacted form. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 11:38 am
The United States will also lift sanctions against nine Belarussian entities, though it is unclear which. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:41 am
United States (5th Cir. 2013)). [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:59 am
The United States filed its opposition on June 5, 2015. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 3:00 am
As I discussed here, the Fourth Circuit recently ruled in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am
” I’m going to go Scalia one better and insert some reaction gifs here. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:01 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm
Although deportation may result in loss of all that makes life worth living (banishment from the United States and forced separation from one’s family), Ng Fung Ho v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:05 am
Blue Buffalo Company Ltd. v. [read post]
