Search for: "United States v. Sharpe"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,302
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2011, 10:22 am
” Wilson v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 7:56 am
United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 8:47 pm
[emphasis added] This is the same approach employed by Justice Sharpe in Griffin v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Section 105 of the Copyright Act precludes copyright protection for any work of the United States Government, but applies only to the federal government. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:15 pm
United States, (SD TX, filed 1/6/2009) seeks a declaratory judgment, injunction, reinstatement and back pay. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 7:43 am
Sharp v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:11 pm
The behavior of the United States government in this case is not one of them. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sandy said in 2006 what is both undeniable and widely resisted in this moment, even by the most progressive branches of the Left: That the United States has a constitution that may not be worth saving in the twenty-first century, even if it can be. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:20 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeImpersonation, Tax Evasion Sentence Upheld; 'Sharp Practice' Not Due Process Violation United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
But can those doctrinal departures and sharp caveats be taken at face value? [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 10:16 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:18 am
Avianca, Inc., the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York sanctioned attorneys for citing to non-existent, fake cases generated by Open AI’s ChatGPT. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 5:45 pm
" As reported in this later New York Times article, the United States government has already paid $300,000 to settle the claims of Iqbal's co-plaintiff. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:20 am
Beginning with the famous case of Bolling v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
See, e.g., Sharp v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Others, a Chancery Division, England and Wales, ruling last week from Mr Justice Nugee [don't ask: the Kats haven't come across him either, but he is a Chancery judge], addressed an important preliminary issue. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:03 pm
§ 1337(a)(3), a complainant must show that an industry in the United States exists with respect to the articles protected by the asserted patent in the form of:(A) significant investment in plant and equipment; (B) significant employment of labor or capital; or (C) substantial investment in its exploitation, including engineering, research and development, or licensing. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm
Because the art market is opaque, diligence is needed to discover an object's true chain of custody, transfer, and ownership.The latest court case demonstrating the need for due diligence is United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Hodges (Ohio), Tanco v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:35 am
Eden Alexander presents the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision, United States v. [read post]
