Search for: "United States v. Stark" Results 361 - 380 of 776
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2014, 11:21 am by Ronald Mann
” Finally, the Court rejected Siegel’s reliance (seconded by the United States Trustee) on its 2007 decision in Marrama v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:50 pm by David Lat
Of course, experts in this area — including some Obama-supporting liberals — told us that Citizens United wasn’t that big a deal.)Thanks to last year’s juicy Obama v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States (1928), foregrounded a right to privacy, an idea that would only later become a core part of liberalism, with Supreme Court decisions such as Griswold v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:33 pm by LTA-Editor
In the United States, the Second Circuit in Cartoon Network v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 4:09 am by Florian Mueller
It's in stark contrast to what the firm's founder, John Quinn, told Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California at a 2014 Apple v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
It is hard to imagine a more stark and tangible manifestation of the original Gilded Age than the large estates built along the Long Island Sound in the region that would later become known as the Gold Coast. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:47 am by Colin Murray
In the 1950s Leo Strauss had criticised the degree to which public debate in the United States had descended into what he described as “reductio ad Hitlerum“, whereby opponents of a policy would liken it to a fascist policy or label its proponents Nazis to score political points (regardless of the distinctions between the policy and those pursued by the Nazis). [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, sorts out the issues involved in the battle between Apple and the government, in light of all the circumstances, including the February 29, 2016 opinion by Eastern District of New York Judge James Orenstein in the separate Apple iPhone unlocking case. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:41 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f), which permits the president to bar entry of foreign nationals that would be “detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 3:49 pm by Lyle Denniston
  He ruled that the Supreme Court’s ruling last Term in United States v. [read post]