Search for: "United States v. State of Mich."
Results 361 - 380
of 874
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
Glenn, supra.The Court of Appeals goes on to explain how and why the prosecution arose, what it involved and why Glenn was convicted:Defendant, an officer with the United States Customs and Border Patrol (CBP), worked at the Canada–United States border in Detroit, Michigan, during the relevant year of 2013. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:20 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:07 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Crane, 50 Mich 182, 15 NW 73 (1883); Grand Rapids, etc R Co v Cheseboro, 74 Mich 466; 42 NW 66 (1889); Union Depot Co v Backus, 92 Mich 34; 52 NW 790 (1892). [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Holyfield[48] and overturned its decision, from Claymore v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:54 am
United States, 2007 U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
The Plaintiff, a Canadian citizen, married a United States citizen on May 9, 2005. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
Colo. 1989).Discussion of this balancing in Brazil is far behind that in the United States, and backlash on ENA lacks adequate grounds. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:03 am
Thomas, United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:09 am
Mich. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
Dep't of Treasury, State of Mich., Revenue Div. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:45 am
State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:43 pm
[3] See Consent Decree, United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:03 am
Conditional resident status is conferred on an alien to a United States citizen or a lawful permanent resident in a marriage deemed bona fide although less than two years old. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:22 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Mich. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:49 am
[United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
Indeed, one expert in the employ of the United States government, who would go on to become a major testifying expert witness for plaintiffs in asbestos litigation, opined in a 1973 publication, that mesothelioma was a problem limited to exposure to South African crocidolite, which was not in every asbestos-containing insulation product.[9] In any event, Judge Wisdom never directly addressed Section 388, and the framing of the Borel case as a consumer case prevailed. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:04 pm
As the Supreme Court struck down the core of the so-called "Defense of Marriage Act" in United States v. [read post]
