Search for: "United States v. State of Minnesota" Results 361 - 380 of 1,814
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2021, 6:05 am by Howard Friedman
Mariner, Shifting Standards of Judicial Review during the Coronavirus Pandemic in the United States, (22 (6) German Law Journal 1039-1059 (2021).Thomas McMahon, The Great Commission, Papal Bulls and the Doctrine of Discovery: from the 4th Century to Current Law, (August 26, 2021).Josh Blackman, The Irrepressible Myth of Jacobson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm by NARF
United States (Bad Men Clause; Court of Federal Claims) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html In re H.V. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:26 pm by Unknown
United States (Sovereign Immunity; Federal Torts Claim Act)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlPeople in Interest of K.C. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Shareholder Advisory Vote on Electioneering Contributions Whereas, the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:15 am by franchiselawadmin
Section 280E refers to a provision in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of the United States. 280E has significant implications for businesses involved in the sale of controlled substances, including marijuana (or “cannabis” under Minnesota law). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:15 am by franchiselawadmin
Section 280E refers to a provision in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of the United States. 280E has significant implications for businesses involved in the sale of controlled substances, including marijuana (or “cannabis” under Minnesota law). [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:53 am
Minnesota, like some other states, has a statute criminalizing knowingly false statements in ballot measure campaigns. [read post]
17 May 2023, 3:22 pm by NARF
State of Alaska, Dept. of Health & Social Serivces, Office of Children's Services (Indian Child Welfare Act) State of Oklahoma v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:40 am by Patricia Salkin
Paul, Minnesota, alleging violations of its rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), as well as its rights under the constitutions of Minnesota and the United States, including the First Amendment. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 11:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:     In 1934, in the midst of the Depression, the United States Supreme Court, in Home Building & Loan Ass’n v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
" Here defendants had the right to hold religious ceremonies (with invited guests) on land ceded to the United States. [read post]