Search for: "United States v. The Commissioner"
Results 361 - 380
of 3,125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2023, 4:32 am
The en banc Court examined a federal statute that criminalizes the filing of retaliatory liens against "any officer or employee of the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 8:38 am
Body: SC19381 - Newland v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
Unfortunate;y for the carrier, however, the "notable exception" had already successfully lobbied to make that move a lot more difficult:"Louisiana Insurance Commissioner Issues Cease and Desist Order to United HealthCare. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 2:01 am
The court's decision casts serious doubt on many of the measures currently in place, most notably in relation to the United States's own national security and surveillance activities, and thus raises new questions about how the European Union would continue to interact with the global digital economy. [read post]
9 May 2024, 12:38 pm
In the United States, for example, the First Amendment guarantees that platforms generally have the right to decide what content they will host, and their users have a corollary right to receive it. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:06 pm
The case arises from a challenge to the transfer of personal data from the EU (via Ireland) to the United States, which relied on a Commission Decision 2000/520 stating that the Safe Harbour system in place in the United States was ‘adequate’ as permitted by Article 25 Data Protection Directive. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:46 pm
Similarly, in Port Washington Union Free School Dist. v Port Washington Teachers Assn., 268 AD2d 523, the Appellate Division ruled that a CBA provision that allowed a teacher to be absent with pay on "any of the religious holidays designated by the New York State Commissioner of Education" without charging his or her absence to leave credits violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 11:07 am
HSS Enters. v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
As stated in a study by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the relationship between climate change and the full and effective enjoyment of the rights of the child: The negative impacts of climate change on children trigger obligations among all duty bearers to take action to protect all children from its actual and foreseeable adverse effects. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:25 am
R (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
Perich then filed a Charge of Discrimination with the United States Equal Opportunity Commission (EEOC). [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 12:45 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will publish...Commissioner John Doll: “We’d Allow Every Patent Application If It Just Met The Requirements” John J. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 12:00 am
Burdick, the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit the issue of judicial immunity from lawsuit in which Burdick alleged that his constitutional rights were violated by actions of Schroeppel Town Justice Armen J. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 9:42 am
") SC18378 - Mayfield v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:05 am
After last week’s Supreme Court decision in Lucia v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Francello v Mendoza, 165 AD3d 1555 and Matter of State of New York v New York State Pub. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Francello v Mendoza, 165 AD3d 1555 and Matter of State of New York v New York State Pub. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:12 am
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (“UNHCR”) was an intervener in the proceedings and the Divisional Court failed to “engage with the evidence of UNHCR concerning problems affecting the processing of asylum claims in Rwanda”. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 1:45 pm
The courts have suggested that a similar ordinance in Chicago was valid, and courts in other states have held that home rule units have the power to investigate corruption in public officials, the court noted. [read post]
Myong Nam Kim v. Board of Liquor License Commissioners for Baltimore City (Md. Ct. of Spec. Appeals)
3 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
The Licensees challenged their citations before the Board of Liquor License Commissioners for Baltimore City (the “Board”), arguing that the statute was unconstitutional because (i) it violated Article III, § 29 of the Maryland Constitution, which requires that all laws enacted embrace but a “single subject” and; (ii) it violated equal protection as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article… [read post]
