Search for: "United States v. The Commissioner"
Results 361 - 380
of 3,122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United State provides as follows: §3. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:47 pm
In September 2021, allegations of sexual abuse led to the United Nation’s (UN) decision to remove Gabon peacekeepers.This, of course, is not unique to the enterprise of UN peacekeeping.In 2016, for instance, the New York Times reported: The latest cases, uncovered by investigators in early January, add to concerns about the failure of the United Nations to curb what Rupert Colville, a spokesman for the Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights, called the… [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:31 pm
A judge today removed a county official from office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, the hoary post-Civil War provision that bars certain people from holding office if they have “engaged in insurrection” against the United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:01 am
The Article brings into view the full scope of the negotiations between the Sisseton- Wahpeton people and U.S. commissioners in 1889, demonstrating that the Dakota people never consented to any reduction or elimination of reservation boundaries when they agreed, under desperate circumstances, to sell to the United States the unallotted lands within the reservation. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection John Edwards, the Information Commissioner, has opened an investigation into concerns that the Ministry of Justice itself was unlawfully processing barristers’ personal data. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Statement by Commissioner Uyeda on Final Rule Regarding Pay Versus Performance Posted by Mark T. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 3:54 pm
SB 1262: Background Checks This bill was inspired by the California Court of Appeal’s decision in All of Us or None of Us. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:42 am
United States, 295 U.S. 602, 625-26 (1935). [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:27 am
The plaintiffs in Seviour-Iloff v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm
The guidance, issued in the aftermath of the Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 10:12 am
Jeong v. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 4:50 am
The case, Rose et al. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:30 am
See United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 4:08 pm
Commonwealth, 4 Va. 447, 449 (1824); State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 5:30 am
This, opined Commissioner Rosa, deprived the Probationer of her ability to argue that her conduct was protected by the United States or New York Constitutions, explaining "[i]t is well settled that a board of education may not dismiss or refuse to grant tenure to an employee in retaliation for the exercise of constitutionally guaranteed freedoms or statute. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 5:30 am
This, opined Commissioner Rosa, deprived the Probationer of her ability to argue that her conduct was protected by the United States or New York Constitutions, explaining "[i]t is well settled that a board of education may not dismiss or refuse to grant tenure to an employee in retaliation for the exercise of constitutionally guaranteed freedoms or statute. [read post]
