Search for: "Unknown Plaintiff v. Unknown Defendants" Results 361 - 380 of 1,551
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2019, 10:00 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Plaintiff sought early discovery to ascertain the identities of the unknown defendants. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Canada  In the case of Huff v Zuk, 2019 ABQB 691 K D Nixon J awarded the plaintiff defamation damages of $50,000 in action between two dentists. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 5:04 am by Joanna Schwartz
Plaintiffs' success rate is unlikely to increase—jurors' sympathies for government defendants mean that plaintiffs would continue to lose regularly at trial. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 10:41 am by MOTP
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA  Wells Fargo regularly sues itself, styling itself both as Garnishor (Plaintiff and Judgment Creditor) and as Garnishee Bank (Defendant holding deposits of a customer/Judgment Debtor). [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:12 pm by Heather Douglas
The video was seen over 60,000 times and downloaded an unknown number of times. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 5:13 pm by Adam Schwartz
” That means a plaintiff cannot sue a defendant unless they can show “standing,” meaning that the defendant has injured them in a concrete manner. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
Plaintiffs' purported equitable cause of action, based only on an ultra vires claim, would have been unknown to William Blackstone, Chancellor Kent, or Justice Story. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
”” Rudolph v Shayne Dachs Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY 3d 438, 443 (2007) (internal citation omitted), such potential damage cannot save plaintiff’s claim here because the damages that allegedly were proximately caused by the alleged malpractice are unknown. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 3:08 pm
CarMax Auto Superstores, LLC (9th Cir. 2017) 845 F.3d 916, 918 [defendant’s correction offer did not bar plaintiff’s recovery of attorney’s fees where plaintiff sought only injunctive relief for violation of the CLRA].) [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm by Andrew N. Vollmer
Plaintiffs and defendants continue to have too much room to litigate over which persons should have primary liability for securities fraud. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Of this alleged scheme between Sidley and Valdez, plaintiffs allege that, unknown to them, but known to Sidley lawyers, the Opinion Letter could not support the supposed tax treatment represented, including in particular the claimed basis in Euros purportedly held by Kislev and sold to plaintiffs. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Of this alleged scheme between Sidley and Valdez, plaintiffs allege that, unknown to them, but known to Sidley lawyers, the Opinion Letter could not support the supposed tax treatment represented, including in particular the claimed basis in Euros purportedly held by Kislev and sold to plaintiffs. [read post]