Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 361 - 380
of 6,668
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2014, 12:12 pm
v=lLCEUpIg8rE [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 9:01 am
In the first filed report on this morning's oral argument in Crawford v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:01 am
I doubt Roe v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 1:03 pm
It's Inland Empire Voters v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 8:08 pm
As reported by Amy Howe in Howe On The Court The Supreme Court declined to intervene in the case of Richard Brakebill v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 7:55 am
The Ninth Circuit ruled this week in Townley v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:01 am
I doubt Roe v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 8:08 pm
As reported by Amy Howe in Howe On The Court The Supreme Court declined to intervene in the case of Richard Brakebill v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 1:04 pm
See League of Women Voters v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:42 am
On June 17, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Arizona v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:42 am
On June 17, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Arizona v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 6:46 am
The case is American Cancer Society v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 8:13 am
An E2E-V system provides voters with proof that their votes were cast and counted as intended, which means voters don’t have to merely have blind faith in the election software and hardware they use. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 2:38 am
The Supreme Court rules, 6-3, in Crawford v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 10:44 am
A few days ago, the Ninth Circuit heard argument in Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:21 am
To recap, briefly: In the lead opinion in Crawford v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 12:55 pm
They don't conflict with the voter-approved initiative or the Legislature's MMP. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 12:02 pm
I am a few days late on this from the oral argument in Husted v. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 11:07 pm
In League of Women Voters of the United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 9:46 am
From redistricting, to campaign finance, to voter ID, to the next Bush v. [read post]
