Search for: "Warner v. WARNER COMPANY"
Results 361 - 380
of 923
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
Almost all of these updates have been compiled and crafted by our good friend and dedicated colleague Alberto Bellan, to whom the IPKat and Merpel raise their paws in a respectful and grateful salute.Don't forget: there's also a mini-summary at the bottom of the post that lists the features carried by this weblog over the previous month.Last week's substantive Katposts look like this:* Swiss claims: a Kat reflects on the Warner-Lambert v Actavis appealAfter… [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:20 am
What has this to do with investing in companies that own trade secrets? [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
This Kat posted a short report of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, judgment delivered by Lord Justice Floyd in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556, and has in the meantime been cogitating and ruminating (hard as that is for a non-ruminant carnivore) on what it all means.To remind readers on where we were before this appeal decision, Warner-Lambert marketed the drug pregabalin for three authorised indications… [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
Amtelecom Limited , 2015 FCA 126 http://t.co/W67peQ9fF2 -> Facebook Calls Out Burlington Tech Company For Name: Designbook https://t.co/NjJ2pi1WDw -> Irish decision granting graduated response injunction against ISPs Sony Music Entertainment v UPC [2015] IEHC 317 http://t.co/R50NpUzEAp -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2015-06-01: U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
Geier v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
Amtelecom Limited , 2015 FCA 126 http://t.co/W67peQ9fF2 -> Facebook Calls Out Burlington Tech Company For Name: Designbook https://t.co/NjJ2pi1WDw -> [read post]
31 May 2015, 3:47 am
Last week the Court of Appeal said that was incorrect in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556, and that actually all that is required is for the infringer to know, or be able to reasonably foresee, that the medicament would be used to treat the condition (Katpost here). [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:36 am
In a judgment handed down today Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556 the Court of Appeal (led by Lord Justice Floyd) has put forward a wider test for the infringement of second medical use patents. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:28 am
In this respect this Kat has pondered whether Mr Justice Arnold’s decision Warner -Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) is a good one in respect of the interpretation of Swiss style claims (Katpost here). [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:38 am
Patentees can no longer take for granted profits made during the term of interim injunctive relief, irrespective of the outcome of the substantive claim.More generally, as regards the availability of interim relief against generic pharmaceutical companies where an invention is claimed in Swiss form, the outcome of the appeal of Arnold J's decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) is awaited with interest.Many thanks to both Paul and Ailsa for both the… [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/pz59bkHuWt -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2015-05-10: Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2015-05-09: Dam… http://t.co/24CNidTRNa -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2015-05-10 http://t.co/z2BvC2Emsk -> Etsy stock tanks 8% on fears of counterfeit goods http://t.co/dQz5uxribD -> 'SNL' Accused of Plagiarizing Muhammad Sketch http://t.co/3CMnuLjVMp -> Warner Bros. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:37 pm
KokeshCase Number: 09-cv-01021 (United States District Court for the District of New Mexico)Case Filed: October 27, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 30, 2015 4/30/15 7/29/15 2015-39 SEC v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 7:30 am
State Farm and Olmstead click HERE.Interestingly, during this voir dire, some of the potential jurors in the jury pool talked favorably about their experience with insurance companies, most were non-committal (silent), and at least one ripped insurance companies in light of a prior bad experience.Sample Jury Instructions in a Post-Koken CaseSusquehanna CountyTo view the Jury Instructions crafted by Senior Judge S. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:59 am
The remaining matter is now the quantum of damages Escape Media must pay in penalties for the infringement in the action brought by nine record companies including Arista Music, Sony Music Entertainment, UMG Recordings, and Warner Bros Records in 2011. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
Beaulne, 2015 QCCS 1562 http://t.co/UyCkzy9qqE -> Guest commentary: Boston’s law firms are targets for cyber criminals http://t.co/37MCtBaeB7 -> Mandated “fair use” language has no place in trade promotion authority http://t.co/eVgq69wy8J -> Limitations on testimonial advertising does not infringe Charter rights College v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:45 am
White v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:53 am
Its decision in Perez v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
| EPO Administrative Council and Board of Appeal’s removal.Never too late 36 [week ending Sunday 8 March] - EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) says Chairman can disobey | OHIM is too rich to be true | eLAW’s TM infringement checklist | Human right and IP | Again on Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Seiko and Seiki in Singapore | The politics of US patent law reform | Haribo v Lindt Goldbear wars | Patent trolls | Private copying |… [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am
The rightsholders are requesting detailed financial information to show that the company profits from its inaction. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
The case of Fortress Grand v. [read post]
