Search for: "Waters v. U.s.*" Results 361 - 380 of 1,408
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2008, 8:58 am
 In finding that the analysis was insufficient, the court relied on National Wildlife Foundation v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:29 am by Mark Murakami
As mentioned in my post earlier, in the Supreme Court's next term, it will hear the case of Lozman v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 8:06 pm
David Schwartz discusses Monday’s argument in Kansas v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:31 am
The majority Appeals Court, in this partially split decision (dissent in part, concur in part), said in conclusion, "In its opinion and order denying a preliminary injunction, the district court stated that 'the State has not yet met its burden of proving that bacteria in the waters of the IRW are caused by the application of poultry litter rather than by other sources . . . . [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:31 pm by WIMS
The defendants argue that the leak was not a 'hazardous condition' because 'the product did not get into the water.' This was disputed at trial. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am by Dennis Crouch
  This deference reached a high water mark in the late 1990s. [read post]