Search for: "Will v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,031
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
After West Virginia v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:58 am
And we said right at the start that in the time we were given there was no way in the world that we could review all the ways in which law enforcement or security forces can invade privacy. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
The BBC explains why the US is going after the popular social media app. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 9:03 am
The CJEU reference in Case C-362/14 Schrems v Irish Data Protection Commissioner. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
This appeal will consider whether the Social Security Contributions and Benefits (Northern Ireland) Act 1992, s 39A(1), which provides for payment of a Widowed Parent’s Allowance, is incompatible with the ECHR, art 14 read with art 8 and/or art 1 of Protocol 1. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
blog on Brevan Howard Asset Management v Reuters From the Law Society Gazette on Harrath v Stand for Peace From Scottish Legal News and Shoosmiths on Monroe v Hopkins Internet and Social Media Socially Aware have published a post listing some of the most significant social media news stories from the week. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:12 am
The Supreme Court found in favour of the Secretary of State, as had the Divisional Court and the Court of Appeal, that the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Act 2020 had in effect made the Asylum Procedures Directive no longer applicable. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
Internet and Social Media Australia has passed a new law to punish social media companies for not policing violent content. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:01 pm
The Social Security portion of the SECA tax is limited to the first $160,200 of self-employment earnings for 2023 (and the first $168,600 in 2024). [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
It tried to do so in the context of Supreme Court of Canada judgments in R. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
The State Commissioner upheld the discontinuance on the grounds that Mrs. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
The State Commissioner upheld the discontinuance on the grounds that Mrs. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
P v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, heard 3-4 May 2017. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
Today the European Court of Justice (CJEU) published its highly anticipated judgement in the case of Data Protection Commissioner Ireland v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems, colloquially known as “Schrems 2.0”. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 4:26 am
— via Real Lawyers Have Blogs Disruptive Technology in the Workplace: Employment Law Considerations — via Technology Company Counselor 5 best practices for lawfully monitoring your employees’ social media activities — via The Philadelphia Business Journal Do you know what apps your employees use? [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm
The Scottish Information Commissioner has found that the Scottish Government takes longer to response to Freedom of Information Requests from journalists. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 175l et seq.) at the school. (2) The term “public health emergency designation” means the declaration— (A) of a public health emergency, based on an outbreak of SARS–CoV–2 or another coronavirus with pandemic potential, by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d); or (B) of a domestic emergency, based on an outbreak of SARS–CoV–2 or another … [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:20 am
” Finally, said the court, the fact that Rice's application for, and receipt of, Social Security disability insurance benefits subsequent to the termination of his employment does not, as a matter of law, preclude a finding that Corrections had unlawfully discriminated against Rice. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
Surveillance On 30 January 2023, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal found MI5 agents “unlawfully retained people’s intercepted data,” via the use of surveillance warrants from 2014-2019, Liberty and Privacy International v Security Service [2023] UKIPTrib1. [read post]
