Search for: "William Baude"
Results 361 - 380
of 404
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2013, 4:00 am
William Baude Most constitutional law scholars pay no attention to the field of conflicts of law. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:00 am
William Baude, a lecturer in law at the Stanford Law School, has posted Rethinking the Federal Eminent Domain Power, which will appear in volume 122 of the Yale Law Journal. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 8:59 am
I would rush home with great anticipation and dial in my 4800-baud modem and I would have four messages from four very good friends. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:43 am
William Baude (Stanford Law School) has posted Clarification Needed: Fixing the Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act (110 Mich. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 8:53 am
William Baude’s critical view of portions of the new law appears in “First Impressions” of the Michigan Law Review here. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:28 am
William Baude, Stanford Constitutional Law Center, "Beyond DOMA" Prof. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Before I go, I wanted to leave you with a few thoughts about these legal issues that go beyond the issue of DOMA and same-sex marriage. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 8:19 pm
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Amidst all of my many posts about what federal courts should do if DOMA is struck down, I thought I should say a little bit about Congress. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:05 pm
(William Baude, guest-blogging) So I’ve explained why I reject two of the three possible approaches that federal courts take to the marital choice of law problem. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:01 pm
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Before I get to the last phase of my stint here, I thought it would be helpful for me to address one recurring theme in the comments. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:03 pm
(William Baude, guest-blogging) So earlier this morning (yesterday, Eastern Time, which apparently governs the Volokh Conspiracy), I explained why the federal government does indeed need to look in large part to state law when it tries to figure out whether a couple is married. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 10:45 am
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Yesterday I outlined the three different ways that courts have dealt with the concept of marriage in federal statutes. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 5:53 pm
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Before we dive deeper into the federal cases I blogged about this morning, I thought it would be helpful to clarify a point featured in several comments. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 10:26 am
(William Baude, guest-blogging) So states have different rules about who can get married, and states also have different rules about which state’s law to look to when a same-sex couple moves around the country. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:41 am
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Here are a few follow-up questions to my first post this morning. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
Poor Eugene Volokh is tasked with commenting on this albatross on Friday morning, as well as William Baude's paper on Beyond DOMA. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:14 am
(William Baude, guest-blogging) So we’ve established that in a world without DOMA, state law is the natural place to look to figure out whether a same-sex couple is married. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:32 pm
(William Baude, guest-blogging) A number of commenters have asked about the relationship between law and marriage. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:15 am
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Thanks to Eugene and the conspiracy for having me here. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I’m delighted to report that Wiliiam Baude will be guest-blogging for us this coming week. [read post]
