Search for: "Williams v. General Insurance Co." Results 361 - 380 of 453
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Ciro EEOC Investigations Requires That Employers Notify Insurance CarrierAmerican Center v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 1:01 pm by Taryn Rucinski
Phil; Allen, Yvonne C.; Couvillion, Brady R.; McKee, Karen L.; Vervaeke, William C. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Santillana, No. 06-1276 A sentence for using a firearm during, and in relation to, a drug trafficking offense is affirmed where: 1) defendant was not challenging the reasonableness of the sentence; and 2) the circuit court generally does not review a district court's decision not to depart downward, and no exception to that rule applied here. .. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:48 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Lurgi Energie Und Entsorgung GmbH- the matter was dismissed for becoming infructuous on 07.01.2007- see order]09.03.2006: Delhi High Court stayed proceedings before it.03.04.2007: In view of the dismissal of Civil Appeal 339/ 2003, the Supreme Court listed the matter alongwith Civil Appeal 7019/2005-Bharat Aluminium Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:05 am by Jeffrey May
Grand jury indictments against in Maruyasu Industries Co., Ltd. and Tokai Kogyo Co., Ltd. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Back when I was a summer associate at White & Case, we used to talk about SEC v. [read post]