Search for: "Williams v. State of California" Results 361 - 380 of 2,617
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2013, 4:32 pm by Sheppard Mullin
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Susan Illston, Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of California Aton Arbisser, Kaye Scholer LLP Elizabeth J. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 1:16 pm
The purchaser provided the “when” by stating that she bought the product this year at a CVS Pharmacy. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 4:25 pm by CAFE
Session (2017) opinion Central District of California Judge Dolly Gee’s order in Flores v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 2:51 pm
Ford: Two of the Three Issues Raised in the Petition are Not Dependent on the United States Supreme Court's Opinion in Williams III California Supreme Court Grants Review in Buell-Wilson v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 9:43 pm
” - William Shakespeare Gideon reflects on our Supreme Court confronting the issue of gay marriage in Connecticut in light of the California Supreme Court’s overturning California’s ban on gay marriages: …it seems to me that the most likely outcome is that the Court will punt the case (  Kerrigan v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:42 am
Tushnet, one of the pre-eminent constitutional scholars in the United States. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 1:02 pm
One cert petition that is missing, but may still be worth watching, is a cert petition in Williams v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 8:37 am
The article identifies the case as "Williams v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 11:03 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 161342 (ED PA, Sept. 20, 2018), a Pennsylvania federal district court allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his complaint regarding access to religious services, inability to wear his kufi outside his cell, and inability to speak with an Imam.In California Department of State Hospitals v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:32 am by Mike
 Judge William Alsup stated the United States Supreme Court 'has not yet made a clear ruling that admission of irrelevant or overtly prejudicial evidence constitutes a due process violation sufficient to warrant issuance of the writ.' Holley v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 4:25 pm by Legal Talk Network
Baby Girl before both the United States Supreme Court and the South Carolina Supreme Court and in Nielson v. [read post]