Search for: "Wilson v. United States" Results 361 - 380 of 1,527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 8:26 am by Reference Staff
After a last hour veto by President William Taft in the final days of his administration in 1913, and another veto by President Woodrow Wilson in 1915, Congress was able to overcome a second Wilson veto in 1917 and pass a literacy test bill. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
  However, the explanatory notes to the Act indicate that the new defence is intended to reflect the common law as set out in Flood v Times Newspapers [2012] UKSC 11, in which Lord Mance stated that it would seldom be in the public interest “…to publish material which has not been the subject of responsible journalistic enquiry and consideration. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am by John Elwood
Texas and United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
  In Brett Wilson LLP v Persons Unknown [2015] EWHC 2628 (QB) (see our blog here) Warby J noted that whether financial loss is “serious” must depend upon the context. [read post]