Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,056
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2019, 1:17 am
Alexandra Mezulanik, research assistant at UCL IBIL, examines the much anticipated decision in Martin v Kogan of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:11 am
In Guiste v Lambeth LBC (2019) EWCA Civ 1758, the Court of Appeal returned again to the meaning of Lord Neuberger’s eliptical phrase in Hotak v Southwark LBC that, for the purposes of the homelessness provisions in the Housing Act 1996, vulnerability meant being significantly more vulnerable than ordinarily vulnerable as a result of being made homeless. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 2:18 pm
D. and A. v United Kingdom 32949/17 34614/17 The Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lord Carnwath dissenting) found justified discrimination in imposing the bedroom tax on a woman who, as a result of domestic violence, had had her home treated under the Sanctuary Scheme to include the modification of the attic to render it a “panic room”. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:33 am
The Trade Union Congress was influential in getting them included in the Act, and my friend Lord Lloyd of Kilgerran took the leading role (I think) in piloting them through Parliament, but they hardly ever deliver for the employee-inventor (Kelly and Chiu v GE Healthcare [2009] EWHC 181 (Pat) being the single swallow that could not make a summer). [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:13 am
Huawei (consolidated with Conversant v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
See Gobitis v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
“If not in this case, then the words justiciable in principle are… empty words. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:41 am
He refers to Burmah Oil v LA [1964] UKHL 6 noting there appeared to be no difference between the Scottish and English position on prorogation. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 7:31 pm
The recent arbitration decision in Acadia University v Acadia University Faculty Association is instructive in this regard. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 10:28 am
In other words, was it open to Photobox to narrow the scope of the undertakings to trial? [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 12:09 pm
Blame old geezers like me | Mr Justice Arnold to become Lord Justice Arnold: congratulations! [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:20 pm
Rik LambersWhile the numerous recent court decisions may suggest so, the ‘F’ in FRAND does not stand for ‘Fashionable’. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm
Laureyssens v. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 12:10 pm
Livewest Homes Ltd v Bamber (2019) EWCA Civ 1174 This was the Court of Appeal hearing of a second appeal on the issue of when six months notice of intention to terminate a tenancy must be given under section 21(1B). [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 4:29 am
The evil Lord V. is not just a convention of a magnificent writer. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:53 pm
Of course, this is the great thing about the word ‘serious’: its flexibility. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lady Hale, Lord Wilson and Lord Carnwarth. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
” FCC v. [read post]
