Search for: "YU v. YU"
Results 361 - 380
of 386
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2009, 5:15 pm
See The Upper Deck Company v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 12:57 am
The case is titled Konami Digital Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 8:30 am
(8) The federal Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear oral argument in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:15 pm
Earlier this month, Federal District Court Judge Consuelo Marshall awarded attorneys fees of $3,515,985 in Wang et al v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 9:41 am
The case is titled Konami Digital Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm
Bobby Yu-Chen Liu, No. 07-1046. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 4:35 pm
This issue does too: there's an article, "Looking for zero-sum or win-win outcomes: a game-theoretical analysis of the fair dealing debate", by Yu-Lin Chang, whose excellent doctoral thesis submitted to Queen's University, Belfast, was examined last year by IPKat team blogger Jeremy. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
Ou v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 8:19 pm
Inst. v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:00 am
In Yu Han Young v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 6:18 pm
Xiu Jin Yu v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 11:46 am
Yu, et al. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 9:02 am
Festo Corp. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 8:44 am
Yu v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 3:21 pm
New Hampshire Public Utilities et al (USDC NH 05-00094 Barbadoro, USDJ) 06-2179, Yu v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 2:33 pm
Bonus ideas-for-teaching link: Peter Yu on Teaching International IP Law via SSRN. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 11:15 pm
Still, 470 F.Supp.2d 1064, 1068 (N.D.Cal.2007) (noting that defendants had conceded that they have a mandatory duty to act on adjustment applications); Yu v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 8:12 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 7:42 am
[23] V. [read post]
