Search for: "BES v. State" Results 3781 - 3800 of 68,911
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2023, 9:15 am by Amanda M. Gómez and Shira M. Blank
On June 30, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States declined to weigh in on whether gender dysphoria can qualify as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), allowing to stand the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Williams v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:25 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Taking this to its logical extreme, visa availability for establishing the dates for filing may be based on just one visa being saved in the backlogged preference category in the year, such as the India EB-3, like the proverbial Thanksgiving turkey. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:14 am by Peter J. Sluka
Gallagher v Lambert In 1989, a divided Court of Appeals held that the at-will employment agreement trumps any heightened duty that the majority would otherwise have to exercise the corporation’s redemption rights: “There being no dispute that the employer had the unfettered discretion to fire plaintiff at any time, we should not redefine the precise measuring device and scope of the agreement” (Gallagher v Lambert, 74 NY2d 562, 567 [1989]). [read post]
Comment The Court of Appeal noted that it was unfortunate that the trial judge was not referred to Hallen v Brabantia. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:30 am by Sotiris Paphitis
” One can easily see that point (b) aims at protecting journalists from being compelled to disclose their sources whilst point (c) prohibits the use of spyware against journalists or their close ones. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 11:51 pm by Frank Cranmer
She would be vulnerable if returned because of a lack of family support and she “would face persecution from non-state agents consequent to her religion, with no sufficient State protection being available to her”. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
FTC Chair Lina Khan previewed this in June, stating that “The word ‘efficiency’ doesn’t appear anywhere in the antitrust statutes. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 11:10 am by Giles Peaker
As per Schon v London Borough of Camden (1986) 18 HLR 341, the test for being a residential occupier was the same as under Rent Act 1977. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: Only nine months after the Supreme Court eliminated the federal constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. [read post]