Search for: "Brown v. Brown" Results 3781 - 3800 of 12,727
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2007, 9:38 am
Some even invent their own little language to help conceal from police (or any eavesdroppers) the subject of their conversation.So, for example, Kevin Freeman and his co-conspirators say "iggidy" when they mean "ounce," "dove" to signify the number twenty, "diamond" to mean ten ounces of crack cocaine, and -- albeit less creatively -- "bread," "cheese," and "chips" to refer to money.Their novel "language" included the… [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:10 pm
That said, Judge Browning writes a good opinion. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 10:24 am by Mark Kende
Grootboom (2000).Next, the Supreme Court and the country in the late 60s and 70s started making progress on implementing Brown v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:25 am by Nexsen Pruet
The opinion issued by the Supreme Court of the United States in that consolidated appeal is known as Brown v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 2:41 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Dixon, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2163 (05 October 2012) Ferriter, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2211 (03 October 2012) Matthews, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2154 (27 September 2012) Williamson, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2114 (02 August 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Whiston, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 1374 (25 October 2012) Davies & Ors v Secretary of State for Energy… [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:27 am by sally
Supreme Court G, R (on the application of) v X School [2011] UKSC 39 (29 June 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Parchment v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 1391 (09 June 2011) Killick, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 1608 (29 June 2011) Saunders, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 1571 (29 June 2011) C v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 1607 (29 June 2011) Brown v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 1606 (29 June 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Telegraph Media Group Ltd.… [read post]
25 May 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Brown, 2022 SCC 18 [2] At common law, automatism is “a state of impaired consciousness, rather than unconsciousness, in which an individual, though capable of action, has no voluntary control over that action” (R. v. [read post]