Search for: "Decisive Media, Inc." Results 3781 - 3800 of 4,861
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2016, 11:47 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
 While invaluable to scholars, the media and business people, it should be noted that fair use is not a right but a defense to copyright infringement. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:47 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  So, if you can't make the decision yourself, and are risk adverse, seek permission. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 12:07 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
The Daily Beast’s Shane Harris tells us that GTT Communications Inc., an American contractor, is supplying Iran with Internet. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:47 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
So, if you can't make the decision yourself, and are risk adverse, seek permission. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 10:00 am
These systems sometimes collide when their with overlapping areas of competence lead to contradictory decisions or mutual obstruction. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:44 pm
 In a 6-year period from 2003-2009, Rosetta Stone spent approximately $57 million for TV and radio advertising, $40 million for print media marketing and $212.5 million to advertise on the Internet. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 6:04 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Proposed Determination notes, for instance, that: A Security Gap Analysis and Assessment conducted for Children’s December 2006-February 2007 by Strategic Management Systems, Inc. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
 If there is a bright spot to be found in New Zealand’s recent jurisprudence, it is that the genesis of England’s serious-harm threshold – Tugendhat J’s analysis in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group ([2010] EWHC 1414 (QB)) – found favour recently in Dobson J’s decision in CPA Australia v NZICA ([2015] NZHC 1854 at [120] and [222]). [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 12:26 pm
(Ars Technica) Judge rejects woman's request to jury trial, orders her to pay RIAA: Maverick v Harper (Techdirt) US publishers and Google settle copyright litigation over Google Book Search Library Project (The Trademark Blog) (Intellectual Property Watch) (EXCESS COPYRIGHT) (Law360) (Lessig Blog) (Michael Geist) (Out-Law) (EFF) (Public Knowledge) (Ars Technica) (Copyfight) (Techdirt) (Law360) (IPKat) (Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) Hoang v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm by Mitchell Stabbe
That honor went to a company called Intersport, Inc., which used the mark for sports programs it produced and registered the mark in 1989. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 9:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The 23 words of Section 5 were so well-crafted and decisions from federal courts and the Commission have been so forward-thinking that I can’t come up with an innovation in advertising – not TV, not the Internet, not social media – where Section 5 hasn’t seamlessly applied. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 8:22 am by Mitchell Stabbe
  That honor went to a company called Intersport, Inc., which used the mark for sports programs it produced and registered the mark in 1989. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 7:08 am by Mitchell Stabbe
  That honor went to a company called Intersport, Inc., which used the mark for sports programs it produced and registered the mark in 1989. [read post]