Search for: "Direct General Insurance Company" Results 3781 - 3800 of 5,941
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2014, 8:52 am by Steven Gursten
The MCCA is in the Court of Appeals because it’s contesting the ruling of an Ingham County Circuit Court judge which directed the MCCA to comply with the public disclosure requirements of Michigan’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and, thus, “disclose [its] general rate calculation information. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:15 am by Docket Navigator
The Money Suite Company v. 21st Century Insurance and Financial Services Inc., et. al., 1-13-cv-00984 (DED January 9, 2014, Order) (Sleet, J.) [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 7:51 pm
Generally speaking, which direction do you think they're going to adjust? [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:34 pm by Marty Lederman
  In the "indirect burden" cases such as the Sherbert line, then, the Court was striving to identify those state actions short of direct legal compulsion that had the same practical effect on religious exercise as does a specific legal command that prevents such exercise--as Solicitor General Fried put the point in his brief in Hobbie v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:41 am by Kenneth Vercammen
        Any previously executed Powers of Attorney, Living Wills, Revocable Living Trusts, and certainly all Medical Directives now require HIPAA amendments. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:15 am by Bradley Joondeph
When exactly do severance payments constitute “wages” for purposes of the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA)? [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:58 am by Chip Merlin
A number of restoration contractors, roofers and public adjusters have been complaining about insurance company directives requiring use of used roof vents and common roof labor to replace roof vents and roof caps. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Foster of the Morrison Foerster law firm noted in their November 15, 2013 memo about the Supreme Court’s cert grant in the case (here), Halliburton “has the potential to be the most significant securities case in a generation. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:30 am by Mark Astarita
An examination typically begins with a series of general questions. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 11:54 am by David M. McLain
  Practically speaking, this means that the employee has two and a half days not to report the accident/injury, but within which to find a lawyer who will typically direct the employee to a doctor who is generously claimant-oriented. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 1:59 pm by Bob Lawless
A few states already have taken steps in this direction, with varying levels of efficacy. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm by Kenneth Vercammen
Thus, generally, cross motions do not "'obviate a plenary trial of disputed issues of fact, where such exists; nor do cross-motions constitute a waiver by the litigants to such a trial.'" [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm by Marty Lederman
  If a religious nonprofit organization opts out, the insurance company that issues the policy to the employer, or the third-party administrator that administers its self-insured group health plan, generally must assume responsibility for contraceptive coverage and provide or arrange separate payments to employees for contraceptive services. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 7:15 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
Nortbridge Indemnity Insurance Company is another attempt by a Canadian court to deal with the ambiguity in the Builders’ risk insurance policy. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am by Marty Lederman
  In this post, I’ll try to grapple with that question and then, toward the end, discuss how it might affect the specific RFRA question at issue in the Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood cases.As I will explain, the mere fact that most large employers might on balance choose to continue to provide employee health insurance plans, even once their employees would otherwise be eligible to purchase insurance on an ACA “exchange,” does not itself establish that… [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 12:41 pm by Gene Killian
Here’s a question, though:  If executives leave a company and steal that company’s clients, do they potentially have insurance coverage for the resulting lawsuit by their former employer? [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:11 pm by T. Greg Doucette
” Surely this would be an investment that generated clients and cash flow. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
An other-than-serious violation is one that has a direct relationship to job safety and health, but probably would not cause death or serious physical harm. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
This test examines whether there are similarities in the expression of an idea and not merely a representation of a general idea in a different form. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
They are generally encouraged to provide pro bono and low-bono services to increase access to civil legal services for those in need. [read post]