Search for: "Does 1 - 41"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 4,702
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2010, 9:44 pm
.), with id. at 37-41 (Tatel, J., concurring) (concluding that such standards do exist). [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm
” IB at 1. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
That number is 41, as in 41 degrees Fahrenheit. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 12:58 pm
§ 3103a, was written into Rule 41(f)(3): (3) Delayed Notice. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
Definitions IN THIS CHAPTER, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES: 1. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:58 am
After first noting that the question lies at the intersection of 1) Separation of Powers and 2) Who has power over Executive Branch officials, and the extent of that power. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
The international legal community recognizes the same sources of international law as does the United States’ legal system. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:17 pm
41. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
41 J. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 9:14 am
This was in response to discussions with federal transportation officials who project cost overruns in the amount of $1 billion. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
Pennsylvania precedent does not support the public nuisance claim plaintiffs advance here, and we cannot predict that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will choose to expand state public nuisance law in the manner plaintiffs urge.Id. at 421 (citations to Lead Industries, Leo, and Camden omitted)In Sheridan v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 11:52 am
In what follows, I explain the decision and its significance by addressing the following issues: 1) the parties and their arguments, 2) the court’s statutory analysis 3), the court’s constitutional analysis, and 4) what happens next. 1) The Parties and their Arguments The government is the only traditional party in the case. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Well, eliminating that kind of mutual ignorance is one of the things that this blog’s all about, so we thought we’d take a look at how §2 of the Third Restatement is faring these days.We see three important issues wrapped up in the Third Restatement – these being, (1) risk/utility balancing as the basic means of assessing liability, (2) the requirement of a feasible alternative design, and (3) employment of negligence-based “reasonableness" as the test. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 4:06 am
Here is the list: 1. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:12 pm
Brunson, 59 M.J. 41, 43 (C.A.A.F. 2003). [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 11:23 am
” What exactly does that mean? [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:07 am
Although food poisoning is a prevalent issue in Australia and New Zealand, both countries have taken major legislative efforts over the past decade to better regulate and enforce food and hygiene standards. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:12 am
And:Before Tim Cole died, he told his mother, "I still believe in the justice system even though it does not believe in me. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 5:49 am
Let's say we have an annuitant who is seeking to raise money and is contemplating the sale of structured settlement payment rights of $1,000 per month from January 1, 2011 for 120 months. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 2:08 pm
What works and what does not? [read post]
