Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 6,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm
Having graduated from the University of California with Honors in English and having taught English in public schools for 25 years, I can merely determine that these proposed regulations address a real concern. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:42 am
” Susinno v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 9:11 am
B&B v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 1:08 am
In 1576, English law set the age of consent at 10 years. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 9:39 am
The writ appeared in English law several centuries ago, became “an integral part of our common-law heritage” by the time the Colonies achieved independence, Preiser v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:33 am
Scene V. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:40 am
More precisely Article 7 (2) of the Brussels Ia Regulation had to be interpreted, according to which a person domiciled in a Member State may be sued in another Member State, ‘in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict, in the courts for the place where the harmful event occurred or may occur’. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 5:16 am
English language » Usage » Dictionaries. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:02 am
United States, 19-783. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:05 pm
The consultation paper is extremely focused on English law. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
Expert witnesses have enjoyed absolute immunity from suit under English law for over 400 years: however, following on from the decision of the House of Lords in Hall v Simons [2001] 1 AC 615 (advocates not immune from negligence claims), by a majority of 5 to 2 the Supreme Court held that the rule could no longer be justified. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
In the United Kingdom and other Council of Europe member states, following the 1981 decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Dudgeon v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 5:38 am
Described in depth in Section V, it also emerges from the multi-disciplinary framework of social healing through justice Professor Yamamoto has been developing for guiding and assessing practical reconciliation initiatives. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 3:38 am
One of those was the 10X Genomics v Nanostring case. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 10:07 am
The case is Baby v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Common law jurists like Sir Edward Coke had claimed that the English constitution was fixed. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:14 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US: CAFC debates whether claim term ‘animal’ includes humans: Martek Biosciences Corp v Nutrinova, Inc (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (IP Watchdog) General USPTO-Pfizer workshop on IP & innovation in Mumbai (Intellectual Property Watch) Australia: Full Federal Court unanimously… [read post]
