Search for: "German v. German"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 5,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2015, 4:59 am
The maximum damages allowed under U.S. copyright law of $150,000 could potentially be awarded for each track infringed, and as Grooveshark has been accused of infringing nearly 5,000 tracks in the lawsuit - that's a massive $736 million (UMG Recording Inc et al v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 10:18 am
Last week I found out about an IP Bridge v. [read post]
UK court discusses copyright protection of fictional characters and defences for parody and pastiche
9 Jun 2022, 1:41 am
In a judgment handed down yesterday - Shazam v Only Fools The Dining Experience and Others [2022] EWHC 1379 (IPEC) - the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) answered 'yes' and applied guidance derived from EU law, including the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Cofemel (Katposts here).Let's see what happened.BackgroundOnly Fools and Horses (OFAH) is a successful BBC TV series that ran between 1981 and 1991, with also some Christmas… [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 5:39 am
In 2004, Ira Leesfield and Tom Scolaro tried the matter of Kemp v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 9:00 am
Moreover, since the mere use of goods is not infringement, Article 3(5) should not apply to those imports and exports for personal use or consumption (this could be hard to reconcile with Case C-98/13 Blomquist v Rolex, on which see Jeremy's post here, if Regulation 608/2013 on customs enforcement is deemed applicable: should it be?) [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:12 am
In Canada, the Supreme Court ruledin Equustek v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:32 am
Peter Margulies examined Judge Gorsuch’s misplacement of his characteristic empathy in Kerns v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:37 am
Of the three key decisions that were scheduled for today, the least important one (a Nokia v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 12:33 pm
Mosafer Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:26 am
Indeed, Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH [2013] EWHC 3624 (Ch) is a 20 November decision of Mrs Justice Asplin in the Chancery Division (High Court, England and Wales) which would have been posted here ages ago if the IPKat had fewer interesting cases to write about and more time in which to write about them.Specialty -- the claimant in these proceedings -- specialised in the distribution and sale of pharmaceutical products,… [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:32 pm
The opinion in Kwasniewski v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 12:41 pm
Circuit’s decision in Taylor v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 12:15 am
| Justice Slade delivers judgement in Arthur J Gallagher Services v Skriptchenko Never too late 99 [week ending on Sunday 5 June] German Constitutional Court sends sampling saga into another loop | Who should pay for the independence of the Boards of Appeal? [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:37 pm
Johnson was born in Louisiana in 1959 “with extensive and grievous” birth injuries typical of those seen in children whose mothers took the German drug Thalidomide to treat morning sickness while they pregnant. [read post]
25 May 2021, 7:20 am
Section V – Copyright enforcement: the technological and cross-border dimensions Section five covers copyright enforcement, in four detailed chapters. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 1:30 am
The reports detailed the deployment of the German military abroad, and various developments at the locations. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 6:01 am
Courts and regulators provided some clarification (in Microsoft v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:44 am
The case was denied a class-action and Shirokov took three years to win his case against the law firm, film studio Achte/Neunte and the German tracking company GuardaLey. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:07 am
If you are the plaintiff in Gubala v. [read post]
