Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 67,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2009, 3:14 am
McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
The concept is useful for understanding the arguments before the Supreme Court in Kansas v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 10:25 am
Ltd v Krisenergy Ltd. [2019] explored this issue in a shipping context. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am
In Gulati v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 8:30 am
(Business Casual v. [read post]
Australian Federal Court Backs India on Sovereign Immunity: Another Twist in the Devas v. India Saga
3 Apr 2025, 4:32 am
In deciding whether India has waived its immunity, the Primary judge invoked the judgement of the High Court of Australia (“High Court) in Kingdom of Spain v Infrastructure Services (“Spain v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:34 am
General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 11:20 am
Bradbury was convicted following trial, but he may appeal given that the case revisits issues raised and left unresolved by US v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:00 am
Miranda v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 1:30 pm
Given the split in the Court of Appeal, it's pretty much certain that the California Supreme Court will step in.So why write something incredibly long when, in short order, the only thing that readers are going to care about anyway is the controlling decision from the Supreme Court.Short opinion. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:37 pm
The purpose of Prop. 36 was to provide relief for many people given life sentences for nonviolent offenses.But there were exceptions. [read post]
25 May 2018, 3:41 pm
As the Court of Appeal recites the facts:"The deputy escorted defendant to the booking area, where inmates change out of their civilian clothes and are given jail clothing after a visual strip search. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm
(Justices Ginsberg and Stevens, neither of whom, I might add, remain either on the Court or breathing).Given that the Supreme Court has indisputably said that primaries have to be closed if that's what the party wants, the plaintiff's argument here that it's unconstitutional for a state to allow primaries to be closed is a surefire loser. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 4:21 pm
That's somewhat surprising given that it was initially unpublished. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 12:15 pm
Say the police had indeed given the warnings. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 2:50 pm
Given the relevant statutes, as well as the position of the DOJ (which is entitled to some deference), that may perhaps be the right course.But I'm still relatively amazed.The Ninth Circuit holds that it's plausible that a school district might well be required to hire a full-time stenographer ("court reporter") to transcribe everything that a high-school student's teachers say in class because the student -- who's hard-of-hearing but not deaf -- finds it "difficult to concentrate"… [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm
The Court of Appeal is pretty much fine with that.At the same time, we don't allow officers to tell the jury that, in their opinion, the defendant is guilty given the evidence against him. [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 7:51 pm
Given the evidence against him, I have a strong sense that the defendant will be convicted yet again at the ultimate retrial, but for now, that's a big win.Third, the location. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:02 am
Here, although I have no quarrel with the bottom line result, I am concerned that the majority goes further than needed in announcing, for the first time anywhere, that a pro se criminal defendant has no right to be advised of the opportunity to present closing argument.I agree, given the litigation history of this case, that the failure to ask Raymond Bell if he wished to make a closing statement to the jury was not error. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 12:32 pm
Mendoza, given the overwhelming evidence against him on the molestation counts, I'm fairly confident his plight does not create overwhelming sympathy for his legal position in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
