Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 3781 - 3800 of 6,574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2021, 1:06 pm by Phil Dixon
A divided Court of Appeals granted a new trial based on three evidentiary errors, as well as errors relating to the jury instructions (that decision is summarized here). [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 10:53 am
Whether the trial court erred in granting the motion by Andersen and AGF to compel arbitration of Novotny's claims against Andersen and AGF. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Would that still leave ground to argue that the court should decide the controversy in a later proceeding because the arbitrator was in no position to determine whether any relief should be granted on the merits? [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 3:44 am by Dylan Gibbs
The case adds fuel to the concern that some doctors are granting MAiD requests that don’t meet legislated criteria. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 3:44 am by Dylan Gibbs
The case adds fuel to the concern that some doctors are granting MAiD requests that don’t meet legislated criteria. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
(G049691; 236 Cal.App.4th 1341; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2012-00593557.) [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:19 am by Douglas Reiser
Eventually litigation followed culminating in a trial in Pierce County Superior Court in October 2007. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:57 am by CMS
Citing Canada Trust v Stolzenberg (No 2) [1998] 1 W.L.R. 658 and Bols Distrilleries v Superior Yacht Services [2006] UKPC 56, [2007] 1 W.L.R. 12, the court found in favour of the claimant and decided that the Oak Liability had been transferred to Novo Banco, which had thereby become bound by the English jurisdiction clause in the Facility Agreement and as a result, the English courts had jurisdiction under article 25 of the Judgments Regulation to… [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Patricia Salkin
Jones next argued that the trial court erred in granting post-trial judgment for RWP on the signature challenge. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 2:03 pm by Glenn R. Reiser
”  Reardon, 83 N.J. at 471.In a case filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, our firm recently succeeded in disqualifying a plaintiff’s lawyer based on RPC 3.7. [read post]