Search for: "House v. Close" Results 3781 - 3800 of 7,516
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2015, 7:16 am by John Jascob
The SEC appealed that order to the Eleventh Circuit, but the district court’s latest order still gives the SEC options that include using its in-house courts (Gray Financial Group, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 10:35 pm
I was very proud to participate in a CAC amicus brief in McDonald v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 10:22 pm by Patricia Salkin
Bloomingburg Jewish Education Center v Village of Bloomingburg, 2015 WL 3604300 (SDNY 6/9/2015) The opinion and order can be accessed at: http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/id=1202729033706/Bloomingburg-Jewish-Education-Center-et-al-Plaintiffs-v-Village-of-Bloomingburg-New-York-et-al-Defendants-14cv7250-KBF Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, RLUIPA Tagged: hasidism and zoning, mikva and zoning, zoning discrimination [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 6:41 am by Elina Saxena
Wells  also  linked to the United States’ en banc petition in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 10:42 am by anbrandon
Ray had three firearms, and the court held that two of them would not support such a conviction despite close proximity to drugs. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 10:01 am by Eric Goldman
Witkoff and Park communicated by email and arranged a physical space meeting to close the purchase. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:36 am by SHG
Having closely checked Jeremy Barrett’s sentencing minutes, nowhere did the judge impose punishment of “an eye for an eye. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 3:52 am
California, supra.The Court declined, however, to extend the exception to searches of an entire house. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 8:20 am by Jeff Lazarus
Warrants were subsequently obtained for his house and cell phones, leading to additional evidence. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 2:12 pm by Giles Peaker
Kazadi v Martin Brooks Lettings Estate Agents Limited & Faparusi, Edmonton County Court 14 May 2015 Thanks to Legal Action September 2015 Housing law updates for this one. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:30 pm by David Russcol
The second change, in 2014, came in the Supreme Judicial Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 6:28 am
(SCC para 94) However, with regard to the first issue and Chevron (US), the court went on to say (para 77): “In closing on this first issue, I wish to emphasize that when jurisdiction is found to exist, it does not necessarily follow that it will or should be exercised … . [read post]