Search for: "Human v. State" Results 3781 - 3800 of 19,134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2011, 12:30 am by Máiréad Enright
In its Programme for Government, the Fine Gael and Labour coalition states: We acknowledge the recent ruling of the European Court of Human Rights subsequent to the established ruling of the Irish Supreme Court on the X-case. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:00 am by The Legal Blog
Girdharilal Yadav (2004) 6 SCC 325; State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:46 am by ANDREW BODNAR, MATRIX
Analysis On its own this decision once again concludes the arguments about postponement of confiscation proceedings, but it should be read in the light of the decisions in R v Waya [2012] UIKSC 51, R v Ahmad, R v Fields [2014] UKSC 36 and R v Harvey [2015] UKSC 73. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:43 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Here is the Cellmark report, taken from the public files of the United States Supreme Court in Williams v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 11:43 am
/**/ The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will be sitting at the University of Houston Law Center on November 3rd, 2009. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:32 am by James Romoser
Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (involving states’ efforts to regulate the private intermediaries between insurance companies and pharmacies) and Tanzin v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 6:55 am by DONALD SCARINCI
However, in defending its controversial abortion law, the State of Mississippi has asked the Court to overturn its prior decisions in Roe v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 6:55 am by DONALD SCARINCI
However, in defending its controversial abortion law, the State of Mississippi has asked the Court to overturn its prior decisions in Roe v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:20 am by Howard Friedman
Ct., April 30, 2012) held that a proposed state constitutional amendment that would have defined as a person "any human being from the beginning of the biological development of that human being to natural death" was inconsistent with the U.S. [read post]