Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 7,539
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
You’re seeing the things you suffered from. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 12:07 pm
So we're going to get a special prosecutor, and we're going to look into it, because you know what? [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
One way to stop these powers from being turned against the public is to create robust and detailed modern privacy law to constrain its use, an independent judiciary who will enforce those limits, and a public oversight mechanism that allows the general public to know what its country's most secretive government agents are up to in their name. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 11:57 pm
Instead of re-passing a zoning code, they just had a county planner do his best to recreate the lost documents, without holding the public hearing required by Colorado law for zoning-law changes. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
WhatsApp’s decision to “synchronise” data with parent company Facebook will face a Spanish probe. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 9:26 am
The consequence is the production of flawed analysis and a likely inability to accurately predict and project Chinese sensibilities and political decision making. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 7:54 am
But if your seatmate happens to be Rosa Brooks, you know you’re going to have an interesting and thoughtful ride. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 5:47 am
— Amarillo September 29, 2008, no pet) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (wherein the official testified that I-35 was a “drug corridor”), most anything can be considered as indicia of drug trafficking to law enforcement personnel. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 10:00 am
One day you return to pick up your child and you’re told that she has been taken into custody by the police because the babysitter became inebriated during the day. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 8:32 am
But that efficiency has costs, and not only to patients and their families: Arbitration also blinds the public to official misconduct. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 1:38 pm
The more information people have in their possession, the more and better decisions they are equipped to make about the products they buy and own. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 4:24 am
“We’re there to keep the peace. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 2:45 am
And some at Yahoo reportedly did think it should have fought, like its security chief Alex Stamos, who Reuters says quit over the decision. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 1:54 pm
AB 2535 comes on the heels of the recent federal decision, Garnett v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 8:15 am
City of New London decision gives them carte blanche to do whatever they want — even if they’re just doing the bidding of a Texas developer instead of following their own city plans. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:50 am
Public agency officials and employees may read newspaper articles about recently decided landmark cases in public sector labor and employment law, and may feel relief, anger, surprise, or vindication in the result. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that the exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 10:47 am
” Clinton reiterated her support for the Obama administration’s decision not to rule out first use and expressed her support for upholding America’s security guarantees. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 10:11 am
You must be aware that this decision has shocked and angered your customers. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 7:34 am
We’re rewriting the exemption. [read post]