Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 3781 - 3800
of 18,452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2012, 2:00 am
Weiss in Chiu v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 4:44 am
From the bench, Chief Justice John Roberts asked in Fisher v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 11:41 am
As Justice Willhite cogently explains. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 10:15 am
v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm
(In re S.B. (2004) 32 Cal.4th 1287, 1296, fn. 3 [granting request for judicial notice of statute’s legislative history filed after argument]; People v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 1:01 pm
As Justice Stephen Breyer put it in his 2005 opinion in Deck v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 5:47 pm
Colorado in Mapp v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:50 am
In an order today, the Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal in Bilski v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:53 pm
For Washington voters, you may register up to 30 days before the election or 15 days if delivered in person to your local voter registration office.So remember, remember, ahem, the 6th of November, as well as the words of Justice Black in Wesberry v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 12:24 pm
I wonder, doctrinally, if Justice Nicholson -- as well as his predecessors (Justice Nicholson relies a lot for his holding on Miller, a California case from 2007) is thinking about this the right way. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:40 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices DeWine, Fischer, French, and Kennedy* No: Chief Justice O’Connor, Justices Donnelly and Stewart *Justice Kennedy would accept the appeal on all propositions. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 12:07 pm
Harris v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:23 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost views Snyder in the context of Justice Holmes’s 1929 dissent in Schwimmer v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 4:47 pm
An unsuccessful partial summary judgment motion before Justice Dunphy in Basaraba v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:46 pm
According to Justice Kennedy, the Court is re-embracing the principle that a speaker’s corporate identity is not a sufficient basis for suppressing political speech, as held in pre–Austin cases. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:39 am
In Windsor v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 7:05 am
I think we’re all in denial. [read post]
26 May 2008, 7:16 am
What are the implications for the Supreme Court and especially for the continued vitality of Roe v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:50 am
In re S.E.O., 873 F.Supp.2d 536, 546 (S.D.N.Y.2012). [read post]
