Search for: "In re P. F."
Results 3781 - 3800
of 4,165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
" In re Engle Tobacco Progeny Tobacco Prods. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
P 23. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 5:30 pm
(See Memorandum to Patent Examining Corps from the Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examining Policy regarding Procedures for Relying on Facts Which are Not of Record as Common Sense or for Taking Official Notice, n.6, citing In re Eynde, 480 F.2d 1364, 1370, 178 USPQ 470, 474 (CCPA 1973)). [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 4:17 pm
F is for FACIL, a Quebec group that supports open source software. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 9:34 am
They're often more complicated than large commercial litigation or breach of fiduciary duty cases. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Mony Life Insurance Co., 318 F. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 2:03 pm
(In re Buckhead Am. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 6:03 am
(In re Buckhead Am. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 11:54 am
Wilson (4th Cir. 2000) 205 F.3d 720; Bius v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 7:06 pm
We're not going to get into that because we're drug and device guys and all we know about seafood - well, when we see food, we eat it.Yeah, we know.... our humor smells like a dead fish, doesn't it? [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 11:26 pm
"Also: In re Etter, 756 F.2d 852, 857 n.5 (Fed. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 1:10 pm
Brook (In re Pugh), 158 F.3d 530 (11th Cir. 1998)]. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 2:01 pm
Diskussionerna pÃ¥gÃ¥r för fullt efter presidentvalet om vem som kommer att fÃ¥ ta över efter Eschenbach, för en mer utförlig genomgÃ¥ng av de diskussionerna, läs här.Namnen är… [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
P. 9.100. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:13 pm
Frank P. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
" (p. 67763, column 3)In its response to comments submitted by Fross Zelnick asking the USPTO to reconsider, the USPTO justifies its position (p. 67762, column 3) by suggesting that its hands are tied by the provisions of the Madrid Protocol:Under Article 3(2) of the Madrid Protocol, the IB controls classification in an international registration. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 6:00 am
If you think that your clients are already satisfied enough with the service you provide, you're probably wrong. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:04 am
Warner-Lambert Co., ___ F. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 1:35 pm
P. 41(f)(1)(D). [read post]