Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3" Results 3781 - 3800 of 7,888
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
The CJEU in Svensson (C-466/12) ruled that a clickable hyperlink (as well as a framing link) to an authorised and publicly available work does not infringe the communication to the public right, because the public is not new. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 8:53 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Madison, Northeastern University School of Law ·         Ann Marie Marciarille, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law ·         Hillary Greene, University of Connecticut School of Law (moderator) Saturday, JAN. 3 12:30 pm - 2:30 pm Omni Shoreham Hotel Diplomat Ballroom Lobby Level Lunch Debate: Resolved, that the Affordable Care Act … [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 6:08 am by Jim Sedor
The order does not bar the state from requiring political committees to register. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 10:02 pm by Julia Darnton
Part 1, focused on consumers, can be found here.) [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 4:30 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
This means 1) focusing on a niche, 2) following leading bloggers, reporters, and writers in the niche, 3) following subjects whether they be laws, terms of art, companies, products/services, or people related to your niche, and 4) engaging in the “conversation. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 2:35 pm by JB
  But both of these are value choices:  I want to make sure that the Constitution maintains democratic legitimacy over time, they want to ensure that the Constitution produces good consequences.Moreover, Mike and John have an elaborate theory of stare decisis that lets them accept certain non-originalist precedents (1) where they reflect a very strong contemporary consensus or (2) where they compensate for previous failings in the process that produced the… [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:17 am by Robert B. Milligan and Michael Wexler
  And, as the study we referenced demonstrates, companies that already have an incident response plan in place spend 1/3 less on security incidents than those that do not have an incident response protocol. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am by Editors
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 10:02 pm by Julia Darnton
Part 2, focused on growers, will appear tomorrow.) [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 7:45 am by John J. Malm
Under strict liability, a plaintiff must prove: (1) the injury to the consumer resulted from a condition or defect of the product manufactured or sold by the defendant; (2) that the condition or defect was an unreasonably dangerous one; and (3) that the condition or defect existed at the time the product left the manufacturer’s control. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:00 am by David Crockett
Grantee #1 does not have to prove that the grantee #2 somehow had actual knowledge of the sale or transfer to grantee #1. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm by Howard Knopf
John Doe and Jane Doe matter presided over by Mme Prothonotary Aronovitch concerning Teksavvy’s motion to be reimbursed by Voltage for its “reasonable costs in the event it had to release information” arising from Prothonotary Aalto’s order of February 20, 2014 which ordered that that:3. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am by Darien Shanske
 Brasher did not get to go into much more detail about this argument before being asked about (1) whether the railroads could pay the motor fuel excise tax and (2) how to analyze the slightly different case of water transport. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
§875(c); and (2) Regardless of what the statute provides, does the First Amendment right of free speech require that only a person intending to cause fear with his threatening utterances be subject to criminal penalties? [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:29 pm by John Palley
It may also designate as a person authorized to act with regard to its nationals its diplomatic or consular agents abroad insofar as the local law does not prohibit it. 2. [read post]