Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 13,303
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2017, 3:15 am
Ottawa plans to fine companies that fail to report data breaches https://t.co/LY1ogBwgCa -> https://t.co/bL1Ogbg6Ge agrees to shut its audio-ripping website after record labels take it to court https://t.co/A2tqTwklvV -> India: Puttaswamy v Union of India, Supreme Court recognises constitutional right to privacy in a landmark judgment https://t.co/HspeKyDL3w -> Yahoo loses a court battle and a class action will proceed for massive cyber breaches in 2013-16! [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 10:07 pm
And a class action was filed, Roe v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 9:54 pm
” The settlementIn terms of class actions in the federal court system, Birbrower v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 3:07 am
“Judge dismisses lawsuit that challenged Zillow’s home price estimates” [Chicago Tribune, earlier] Seventh Circuit: immunity doctrine bars relief for governor’s aide whose home was raided in Wisconsin John Doe probe [Archer v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 11:59 am
Broomfield v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
Later this year the Supreme Court of Canada is scheduled to hear the appeal of R. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 1:16 pm
Closing with some more food for thought, literally, When "mayo" is not mayonnaise, yet still is mayonnaise: All a matter of the label? [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 9:03 am
Supreme Court dicta has interpreted good faith as having no knowledge of prior use of the mark (K Mart Corp. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
Substantial equivalence is established with respect to intended use, design, energy used or delivered, materials, chemical composition, manufacturing process, performance, safety, effectiveness, labeling, biocompatibility, standards, and other characteristics, as applicable. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 1:15 pm
Two cases:Dennis v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 5:32 pm
In Zauderer v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:55 pm
Rubenstein v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 11:33 am
(Meyer v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 7:04 am
Alpha Pro Tech, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:39 am
This is why Spokeo was presumed to be subject to the FCRA in the recent Supreme Court case, Spokeo v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 4:53 pm
In Esparza v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 4:18 pm
Norway; Morice v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
In Rubenstein v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:01 am
Korolshteyn v. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:10 am
Additional Resources: Moon v. [read post]