Search for: "Lawrence Read"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 4,128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2008, 3:15 am
Most members of Congress would welcome the opportunity to do what they ran for office to do: Govern based on their judgment, Lessig said, Read more here. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
In 2003, the Court corrected itself in Lawrence v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 9:53 am
While I don’t know which way this one will go, it sounds like the attorney’s for those opposed to gay marriage haven’t read Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 12:19 pm
I am reading an advance copy of a book that will be published in May called The Cult of the Presidency. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 8:13 am
Today, I read about the shooting death of 17 year old Simmie Williams in Florida. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 6:18 am
Explaining to Reporter Millsaps--again--that Staff Sergeant Ray Girouard and Marine Corps Sergeant Lawrence Hutchins are protected by the Constitution I read Supreme Court Justice David Davis' majority ruling on point (Ex parte Milligan - 1866): "The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times and under all circumstances. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 1:14 pm
" Click here to read it. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 10:48 am
Read it and see for yourself. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 10:47 pm
"LAWRENCE LESSIG'S RUN FOR CONGRESS. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:42 pm
One might begin here by saying that this is the angriest book -- by far the angriest book -- that one has ever read. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:35 am
Lawrence Lessig is considering running for congress and I couldn’t be happier about it. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 3:32 am
The SCL plays host to Lawrence Lessig this April 30th in London. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 10:33 pm
.- Lawrence Lessig on Cyberspace - two different social goals in cyberspace: (1) zoning speech. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 1:16 pm
Lorna Smith's motion to dismiss relied on a 2007 decision by Justice Lawrence Knipel, specifically ruling that the 2000 amendment meant that the TA could not be sued under the city law. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 2:49 pm
First Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 5:32 am
Connecticut and Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 11:21 am
I wonder how my letter will be received, if it is even read....? [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 9:47 am
I suppose it cuts against certiorari that there are only a handful of states with statutes precisely like these, but reading Lawrence to undermine statutes grounded in public morality may have unforeseen effects — such as the 2005 district court decision (later reversed by the Third Circuit) that had used Lawrence to hold the federal obscenity statute unconstitutional. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 7:08 am
My read is that both firms—and, on the whole, the individuals involved—are going to be far better off in the long run. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 6:31 am
Specifically, you should read the twenty minutes by Judge Nickerson apologizing to Mr. [read post]
