Search for: "Lee v. LEE" Results 3781 - 3800 of 7,978
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2015, 12:00 am
Cirrito, PhD, to associate professor of neurology in the School of Medicine (took effect March 6); Gautam Dantas, PhD, to associate professor of pathology and immunology; Li Ding, PhD, to associate professor of medicine in the School of Medicine; Ramanand V. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
[Although Justice Dollinger relied heavily on the 2005 opinion of the Second Department in Lee v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:14 am
Having duked the matter out in the United States Patents and Trademarks Office, and subsequently at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the matter has moved on to the District Court of Virginia, where the decision was handed down only a few days ago.Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 10:09 pm by Bill Marler
Michael Lee Beachwood is a 60-year-old gentleman who lives in Kihei, Hawaii with his 53-year-old wife, Sheryl (“JJ”) Preston. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:58 pm by Patent Docs
By Donald Zuhn -- Last month, in Mohsenzadeh v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Wexler of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’s Workplace Class Action Blog 8 Questions For Doing Business in China – Washington, DC attorney Meena Harris of Covington & Burling on the firm’s blog, InsidePrivacy Unpaid Internships Given New Life by the Second Circuit – Cleveland lawyer Todd Leibowitz of BakerHostetler on the firm’s Workplace Class Action Blog The Impact of King v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
Singapore An assessment of damages hearing has taken place in the libel action brought by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong against blogger Roy Ngerng. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am by Amy Howe
  And at casetext, Josh Lee argues that, just as the Court’s 2003 decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 12:02 pm by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
On June 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court invoked the Fourteenth Amendment in the landmark Obergefell v. [read post]