Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 4,048
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2009, 3:14 am
Supreme Court rejected this kind of "end run" in the IPO Laddering Antitrust Case (Credit Suisse v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 6:51 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Fox v R. [2009] EWCA Crim 653 (02 April 2009) Pola v The Crown (Health and Safety Executive) [2009] EWCA Crim 655 (07 April 2009) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council, R (on the application of) v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2009] EWCA [...] [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
However Lord justice Thorpe found four other reasons for refusing relief:1. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:35 pm
McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield District Council [2009] EWCA Civ 285 was an appeal of a summary possession that had been stayed pending Doherty in the Lords. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 6:31 am
Lord v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:39 am
Lord Cooke of Thorndon stated that his admiration for the Indian Courts (mainly the Supreme Court) in its ordinary work, particularly in the field of human rights, is no whit abated. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:39 am
Lord Cooke of Thorndon stated that his admiration for the Indian Courts (mainly the Supreme Court) in its ordinary work, particularly in the field of human rights, is no whit abated. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:39 am
Lord Cooke of Thorndon stated that his admiration for the Indian Courts (mainly the Supreme Court) in its ordinary work, particularly in the field of human rights, is no whit abated. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 7:30 am
Lord & Samuel Williston, Williston on Contracts §45:20 (4th Ed. 2000). [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:00 pm
In In re Lord Abbett Mutual Funds Fee Litigation, 2009 WL 117002 (3rd Cir. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
See especially Lord Mansfield s influential decisions on this score. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:20 am
The right to be compensated was removed by the decision of the House of Lords in 2007, Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Company.The Association of British Insurers has criticised the Bill stating that it is "fundamentally flawed. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 2:28 am
Lord Justice Mummery commented that if it were otherwise, there would be a striking disparity between the treatment of the two types of creditors, which could not be justified by the language of the clause or the general purpose of the CVA. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 4:32 am
The state fares worse in State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 4:20 pm
The range of manoeuvre available to a U.K. court, as illustrated in the above passages from the opinions of Lord Hope and Lord Steyn, is not available to an Irish Court. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:08 pm
Union des Caisses des Maladies, Case C-120/95 Decker v. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 10:10 am
Hopper v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
AUTHOR Tushnet, Mark V., 1945- TITLE The constitution of the United States of America : a contextual analysis / Mark Tushnet. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
R(Ahmad) v LB Newham [2009] UKHL 14 is now available and the Lords have done a pretty good job at destroying the jurisprudence built up by the High Court and Court of Appeal in Part 6 cases. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 4:33 pm
The intervening Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, by Mr Stilitz, supported the position of the council. [read post]
