Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 3781 - 3800
of 21,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2014, 11:48 am
People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 2:45 pm
Marks, 876 F.3d at 422. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 10:58 am
Accordingly, it does not matter if the mark depicts an apostrophe or a quotation mark. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 3:20 am
Quirk, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:02 am
"Los Santos, LLC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:01 am
The issue has since come to more judicial prominence, and the Supreme Court of British Columbia endeavoured to answer the matter last month.Chasing mice or chasing careers; the grown-up world scared MerpelThe case of Vancouver Community College v Vancouver Career College 2015 BCSC 1470 concerned the use of the acronym "VCC"; one that Vancouver Community College had been using prominently for a number of years since the College's inception in the 1960s, as well as… [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:03 pm
In true anecdotal style, the author explains the relevance of Section 115 of the Indian statute (appointment of scientific advisors) by pointing out the open expression of gratitude by Lord Hoffmann in Kirin-Amgen v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 3:17 am
John Edward Guzman d/b/a Club Ed Surf School and Camp v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 12:40 pm
Within the hour, oral arguments will kick off at the Supreme Court in Heller v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 3:48 am
Paradise Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 11:56 am
The opinion is McCarthy v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 2:59 pm
The Applicant contested this evidence stating that although the goods may emanate from one source, the goods are sold under different marks. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Compagnie Gervais Danone v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 2:04 am
Mark Schweizer explores how this ties in with the UPC's proposed ceilings on recoverable costs. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:12 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:14 am
The beginning of this month marked the 45th anniversary of Thurgood Marshall’s term as Associate Justice in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
The Opposition Division dismissed the opposition based on Article 8(5) too, since Elmar Wolf had not adduced evidence of any detriment to the repute of the earlier marks or any unfair advantage gained from them.... and another one Elmar Wolf's appeal to the Second Board of Appeal was more successful: the Board found that the earlier marks were highly reputed in three Member States, that there was some similarity between the marks at issue and that the relevant… [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:32 am
Hearthware, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 11:11 am
United States v. [read post]
