Search for: "Motion" Results 3781 - 3800 of 152,934
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2022, 8:00 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- On November 19th, Senior Party Sigma-Aldrich filed its Substantive Preliminary Motion No. 1 in CRISPR Interference No. 106,132 (where the Broad Institute, Harvard University and MIT, collectively, "Broad" is the Junior Party) asking the Board to substitute the Count pursuant to 37 C.F.R. [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- On December 3rd, Junior Party the Broad Institute, Harvard University, and MIT (collectively, Broad) filed its Contingent Preliminary Motion No. 3 in Interference No. 106,133 (which names Sigma-Aldrich as Senior Party), asking the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to designate certain claims deemed in the Declaration as corresponding to the Interference Count as not having such correspondence, under 37 C.F.R. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by Katherine Pompilio
On Sept. 13, the Justice Department filed a reply to former President Donald Trump’s objection to the government's motion for partial stay of U.S District Judge Aileen Cannon's order to grant former President Trump’s request for a special master to review materials seized during the FBI’s Aug. 8 search of his Mar-a-Lago residence. [read post]
The Delaware Court of Chancery denied plaintiffs’ and defendants’ (including Elon Musk’s) motions for summary judgment on the grounds that genuine issues of material fact still remain to be determined at trial. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 6:00 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Oct. 15, 2018 Gelb, J), Judge Lesa  Gelb of the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas denied a Defendant carrier’s Motion to Sever and Stay a statutory bad faith claim in a post-Koken matter. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm by Steve Brachmann
In affirming the final written decision, the appellate court found that ZTE’s lack of adversarial nature in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings allowed LG Electronics, a joined party that was otherwise time-barred, to properly oppose CyWee’s motion to amend patent claims. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 9:27 am by Eileen McDermott
In today’s ruling, the CAFC said the district court’s denial of transfer was a clear abuse of discretion and ordered the court to transfer the case, but did not address Netflix’s motion to dismiss the case for lack of venue. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 6:28 am by JAntonelli
Many have argued that this is a misuse of Florida’s “pure […] The post Filing a Motion To Quash Against Strike 3 Holdings in Florida – What You Need To Know appeared first on Torrent Defenders. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:57 am by PaulKostro
The Rule requires the attorney for a party aggrieved by a discovery motion to consult with the attorney for the delinquent party before filing the motion to dismiss without or with prejudice. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:58 am
CIV.A.906CV00155-RHC) Judge: Ron ClarkHolding: Motion to Strike Dispositive Motion for Exceeding the Page Limits GRANTED"Blackboard has moved to strike Desire2Learn's fourth dispositive motion for exceeding the sixty page limit of the scheduling order," Judge Clark wrote. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 7:18 am
Noting that improper removal under § 1441(b) is a waivable removal defect, and that Rubber Polymers waited over three months after removal before filing its motion to remand, Judge Clark denied the motion. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 11:40 am by Howard Bashman
” The post “Cert Grant on Preserving Issues via Denied Summary-Judgment Motions; The Supreme Court will finally decide whether a denied summary-judgment motion preserves purely legal issues for appeal” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:38 am
  But, at the core of the motion was something no defendant or defense counsel wants to have to face – allegations of perjury by a former employee. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 1:38 pm by Florian Mueller
"The federal judge sees two legal reasons for which Google's motion couldn't succeed. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:27 pm by Alex Gasser
  ALJ Rogers also determined that Remy’s motion violated Ground Rule 3.5(b) by not appending copies of the pertinent discovery requests to the motion. [read post]