Search for: "No. 337" Results 3781 - 3800 of 4,429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
Bombardier Rec (PATracer) Magotteaux - ITC issues an opinion on remedy, the public interest, and bonding in certain composite wear components (337-TA-644) (ITC Law Blog) Minemyer - N D Illinois delays trial for one year to allow incarcerated plaintiff to attend: Minemyer v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 2:12 am by Kevin LaCroix
More that one litigant has thrown money at a case just to get rid of it, and for a company with annual revenues of $12.9 billion and third quarter earnings of $337 million, the $40 million settlement (to the extent not funded by insurance) could represent a regrettable but relatively small cost of doing business. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:37 pm
On December 2, 2009, Prism Technologies LLC of Omaha, Nebraska (“Prism”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:29 pm
On December 2, 2009, Richtek Technology Corp. of Taiwan and Richtek USA, Inc. of San Jose, California (collectively, “Richtek”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 11:48 am by Dan Frith
The doctrine gained more widespread use the Uniform Trade Secrets Act ("UTSA") (adopted by Virginia at code section 59.1-337(A)), which expressly protects against "threatened" as well as actual misappropriation. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 7:58 am by Michelle Leder
Granted, $40 million to a company of Dell's size - revenues were $12.9 billion during the third quarter and earnings were $337 million - may not necessarily be material (hence the reason why the disclosure was quietly buried in the Q), but it's still a chunk of change. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:56 pm
On December 1, 2009, Analog Devices, Inc. of Norwood, Massachusetts (“Analog”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:46 pm
., Ltd. of Korea (“Samsung”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:27 am
Morgan, 477 F.3d 326, 337-39 (6th Cir. 2007) (finding, in context of claim under 42 U.S.C. [read post]