Search for: "People v. New"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 41,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2007, 1:21 am
2.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 10:06 am
By the 1960s, a new era of sterilization abuse was born, which once again focused on the poor, immigrants, and people of color. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:41 am
In People v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 11:03 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:08 pm
The court noted that there are unusual circumstances in which silence will be admissible (People v Rothschild, 35 NY2d 355 [1974] [defendant police officer had a duty to report to his supervisors if he was taking the bribe money as part of a "sting"]; People v Savage, 50 NY2d 673 [1980] [defendant told police he shot victim during an altercation, properly cross-examined on his failure to make claim that victim was trying to rob him, as he testified at… [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 9:59 pm
D'ALESSANDRO v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 12:19 pm
Provencio (Uranium Mining; Cultural Resources)Holy v. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
In the case at bar, the Family Court's determination that the child's best interests would be served by awarding sole custody to the father has a sound and substantial basis in the record as was held in analogous cases of Matter of Peoples v Bideau, Pierre–Paul v Boursiquot, Matter of Ramirez v Velez and Matter of Paul v Sawyer. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:13 pm
Robert v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 7:19 am
Suddenly it was Labor Day, which for most people signals the arrival of Fall. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 7:50 am
New Hampshire limits total compensation to $20,000. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 6:36 pm
According to BBC News, the suit entitled Ernie Chambers v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 8:16 am
Last week, The Oakland Press and Detroit Legal News published my letter on Johnson v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 12:23 am
§265.01 Unconstitutional Rejected; Defendant Does Not Have Right to Bear Arms in NY
People v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:05 pm
This is already happening as people are starting to use their new rights and more than two-third of Europeans have heard of the regulation. [read post]
20 May 2021, 6:00 am
In the case of Nahum v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 2:53 am
The Court, in substantiating their stance, look to the Court of Appeals case People v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:13 pm
They often face powerful business and political interests with large PR budgets and the means to get their ‘stories’ planted in multiple news outlets at once. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm
v=7uduC8Ydndo [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 1:57 pm
News Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.htmlThis week, in brief: SCOTUS rules in favor of tribal gaming in Yselta del Sur Pueblo v. [read post]
