Search for: "Person v. Person" Results 3781 - 3800 of 123,220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2023, 9:43 am by Rose Hughes
 The US decision in Amgen v Sanofi also highlights fundamental differences in the underlying assumptions between Europe and the US with respect to antibody inventions and the capabilities of the skilled person. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 4:50 am
  Circumstantial evidence is defined as evidence based on inference and not on personal knowledge or observation. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 7:03 am by Blog  Editorial
The post Update on O’Brien v The Ministry of Justice appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:31 am by traceydennis
HJ v Secretary of State for the Home Department; HT v Same ú [2010] UKSC 31; [2010] WLR (D) 174 “To reject a gay person’s claim for refugee status on the ground that, if returned to his home country, he could avoid persecution by living discreetly would be to deny his right, protected by the 1951 Convention and 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, to live freely and openly as himself without fear of persecution. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 5:26 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
I have done a couple of previous posts (here, here, here, and here) about Minnesota's wrongheaded "whole person" approach to felony conviction impeachment, and I am going to continue posting about it until Minnesota courts abandon this horribly misguided approach.... [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
Under Ohio's employment discrimination statute, managers and supervisors have been personally liable for their own acts of discrimination since the Ohio Supreme Court decided Genaro v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:06 pm by scanner1
CAROLYN GEIGER, individually and as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF EUNICE JEANETTE “JEAN” SKELTON, Defendant and Appellee. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:54 pm by scanner1
BALLARD, ADELE KRANTZ, as Personal Representative, and JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 2:38 pm
And do you agree that the evidence against this person established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:34 am by Mills & Mills LLP
Our associate Taras Kulish was recently involved in a decision at the Court of Appeal for Ontario in Ustymenko v. [read post]