Search for: "Peter v. Peter"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 8,629
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2021, 2:45 am
Asda’s appeals were dismissed by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (the “EAT”) (Kerr J) and the Court of Appeal (Lord Sales JSC, Underhill VP and Peter Jackson LJ). [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:56 pm
" In that November 2007 decision in a case known as state v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:12 pm
Hat Tip: Peter Lattman (N.Y. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:40 am
Panetti v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 3:03 pm
Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal, in Templeton v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 11:00 pm
Quite right, said the CFI, dismissing Intervideo's appeal - CFI decision in Case T-105/06 Intervideo v OHIM, (IPKat)EPO adds EPC post-grant data to PRS database (EPO), EU Patent Jurisdiction: Details of New Proposals From Portuguese EU Presidency (Blog@IPR::JUR), (IAM), Teva invalidates acid metabolite patents for terfenedine, (Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and another v Merrell Pharmaceuticals Inc, Aventis and Sepracor [2007] EWHC 2276 (Ch) ), (IPKat), Nice summary of… [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
In the 1996 decision of R v Hinchey, the Supreme Court went through this offence in detail and provided a breakdown of exactly what the Crown needed to prove in order to get a conviction. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:51 pm
Sanofi-Synthelabo et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:07 am
The case about the copyright term, Eldred v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO releases ‘FY2008 Performance and Accountability Report’; claims success despite backlog (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Prospector) USPTO transition team appointed (Managing Intellectual Property) (Intellectual… [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Multimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 1:56 am
However, the Court added that a separate application would be advisable if a decision on the point was urgent, but is not necessary as it is clear from the wording in R.223 RoP that such an approach “may” be followed. [1] Articles 26, 35 and 71, 71a and 71b Brussels Regulation 1215/2012 as amended by EU Regulation 542/2014 More from our authors: Vissers Annotated… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 2:10 am
The referral, but unfortunately not the referred question, has now been answered by the CJEU with its order in Eli Lilly v. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 9:26 am
P’ship v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:11 pm
Co. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 6:47 pm
as follows, 53 Frustration occurs when a situation has arisen for which the parties made no provision in the contract and performance of the contract becomes “a thing radically different from that which was undertaken by the contract”: Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:17 am
Peter Sherwood. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:27 am
Peter Mavrick is a Fort Lauderdale business litigation attorney. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:26 am
Peter Mavrick is a Fort Lauderdale business litigation attorney. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:07 am
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Peter Margulies and Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia weigh in on Trump v. [read post]
